STRANGELAND from audiochuck is an investigative series that examines cases in immigrant neighborhoods.
Season 2: Murder is Maple Shade is hosted by investigative journalist Ben Adair and award-winning journalist with more than 30 years experience across three continents, Tinku Ray.
Maple Shade, New Jersey is a quaint suburb where the motto is, “Nice Town, Friendly People.” But on the evening of March 23, 2017, an Indian tech worker, Sasikala Narra, and her six-year-old son, Anish, were found brutally murdered in their apartment. Police questioned the husband and father, Hanumantha, but his alibi checked out. Six years later, the case is still unsolved, and authorities won’t discuss it. So, we’re investigating for ourselves and discovering new leads, potential motives, and questionable behavior by local authorities. Will there ever be justice for Sasikala and Anish?
Strangeland is produced by Western Sound.
1 Subscriber
Podcast hosts
No host has claimed this podcast yet, if you are the host you can verify ownership by claiming this podcast
© audiochuck
Strangeland
Read more
1 Subscriber
Reviews
persiankitty20
5 out of 5 stars
Whoa! Get your bells on… this is GOOD.
Now this is podcasting true crime, at its best sounds like. Finally, another reason to binge . All them in a row is great.
allie3456789
4 out of 5 stars
Season 2
This season was very well done. Kudos to the entire team. I’m left feeling incredibly sad, angry and outraged for Anish, Sasikala and her family. The Maple Shade PD ought to be ashamed of themselves, investigated and punished as well for the way they clearly mishandled this crime from day one. I firmly believe if this crime took place in an affluent neighborhood and to a white woman and child, the PD’s efforts would have doubled and someone arrested. I pray your show brings forth more information and justice.
BoymomNurse01
5 out of 5 stars
2 is better than 1
LOVE THIS PODCAST! but i have to say season 2- the way it was done kept me at the edge of my seat. the investigation, the dead ends and the sudden clue all while telling the story! season 1 is good to but gah. i need more seasons like season 2 !!
Cas577
3 out of 5 stars
Skip season 1, but season 2 is good
Season 1 is a little rough to listen to. The hosts are clearly reading from a script with little inflection or emotion in their voices. They also don’t have many insightful thoughts to add, and just say how everything is “interesting”. However, season 2 is very well done and was a great listen! I’m looking forward to the next season if there is one.
CarFiGuy
5 out of 5 stars
Waiting for season 3
Excellent podcast!!!
mellen.bo.bellen
4 out of 5 stars
Deep dive investigative journalism work but lacking candid-ness
It’s a great podcast that really takes some deep dives with their investigative work. The narration between the two hosts in season 1 is pretty obviously scripted and lacks the disguise that it’s a script but all in all it’s a great show. I’m looking forward to see what else Strangeland covers in future seasons!
UserFriendly60
1 out of 5 stars
Totally slanted reporting
If a reporter doesn’t realize that law enforcement actually can’t discuss active investigations, but instead acts like LE is somehow not talking because they don’t care about a brown family’s tragedy, that reporter is not worth my time. Sounds like manufacturing issues to sensationalize.
nolamom82
5 out of 5 stars
Captivating!
I could not stop listening and don’t think a true crime podcast has ever enraged me as much as this one. The police should be ashamed of themselves. The brutality of these crimes and the lack of concern for the victims is disgusting. I hope this podcast puts pressure on authorities and brings Justice.
needer79
5 out of 5 stars
Awsome!
Loved this podcast and wish it would have ended in a conviction or at least an more investigation into the information you uncovered.
pipatty113
1 out of 5 stars
Poor work
Why 14 episodes? Soooo boring. Also - they start where they end and end where they start with no info and nothing new. It feels like it is just left open. Super unsatisfactory and boring and waste of time.
Philly Bauer
3 out of 5 stars
Season One a bit Woof
I have not listened to season 2 yet but like so many others have said- the story is interesting but “story telling” is pretty rough. It’s told as if each party doesn’t know any facts or anything about the case when that’s clearly not true. Ben also speaks as if he has no knowledge about anything in crime at all. It would be fine if I’m episode one Ben doesn’t mention this is a case he found fascinating. The fake pretend not knowing information is tough to listen to. Sounds like a junior high play.
Piano50
4 out of 5 stars
Enjoyable!
Just wish they’d bleep the foul language!
carlyy.kay
5 out of 5 stars
Loved Season 2
I listened to the entire second season within a couple of days. It was so good and they did a lot of work to uncover witnesses. The police clearly botched the investigation. However, It did freak me out a bit when I realized he now lives down the street from me 🤯
Luv to ride my bike
2 out of 5 stars
Not a fan
Great reporting on an unknown murder. I enjoy true crime, because I love to see how the bad guy/gal is caught and the mystery is solved. I started with Season two, episode one. However, I found it hard to move on to the next episode, because I felt the reporter was trying to get listeners to believe that the police and FBI would not provide them with information related to the murders solely based on the fact that the victims were people of color. My cousin was murdered, and my grandmother (both caucasians) was unable to get any information or updates on an open case… just as these podcasters were told. It is a common occurrence, investigators are not able to openly speak about an on going open criminal investigation. Is it frustrating? Yes. Is it racially motivated? Is it possible that race played a part is the resources devoted to the solving of the crime…? Maybe? But, I won’t know because I don’t think I will continue to listen, and will move on to another podcast.
AngelaPineda
4 out of 5 stars
Too many episodes for too little information
5 stars for a story to tell / 3 stars for format. My main issues were: the number of episodes. There did not need to be 14. It felt disjointed. As soon as it got interesting it would say “on the next episode…” if this was done for ad dollars or something then that’s their business decision, but personally this felt like too many episodes (esp for the amount of info they didn’t know). It could have been a 2-part Crime Junkie episode. The hosts seemed surprised on multiple episodes when people did not want to talk to them. At times they acted like people’s actions were suspect because of XYZ. And maybe that’s true, but maybe people also didn’t want to bring up horrible memories of a double murder? I guess I’m trying to say it felt like at times they were trying to lead you in the direction of an opinion, without giving you evidence that would definitively lead you to that direction.
smucky
2 out of 5 stars
Interesting story, terrible “journalism”
The hosts are hardly investigative reporters. They tell an interesting story - one that absolutely needs to be told. But there’s so much sensationalism, so little fact checking, so much opinion being passed off as fact, no counter theories, borderline harassment. They build a narrative throughout and then use conversations as facts to pass off their narrative as the truth.
Chmn23
5 out of 5 stars
Great true crime podcast
Season 2 storytelling was leaps and bounds above season 1. Flowed much better and didn’t sound quite so awkward and scripted. A compelling story that deserves all the attention.
dlclay70
5 out of 5 stars
Excellent show!
I binged Season 2 in less than two days. It was enthralling albeit sad. I was really hoping for a resolution in the end. It’s great that there are people like you who care enough to bring these investigations to the surface and keep them alive. Great reporting. Thank you!
Sciut pup
5 out of 5 stars
A forgotten mother & son.
Heartbreaking. No justice for these two. Police refusal to continue to look into any new evidence, stonewalling those who are investigating 6 years later in hopes of solving the murders is, in my opinion, a sign of arrogance & incompetence.
Samira Khairkhawa
5 out of 5 stars
Season 2
I could not stop listening! The reporters did such an amazing job with this case. It’s so unfortunate that this case wasn’t given enough attention to begin with. I hope this sheds light on the case again and people come forward with more information so victims’ family gets justice.
SharondaPink
5 out of 5 stars
Great
You guys did a good job with this. Was hoping for the end to end with a convection or something. But I do believe this isn’t the end of this story.
spotifysuckss
3 out of 5 stars
Great story, disappointing conclusion
This was an incredible podcast and extremely well told story, but there was so many new leads and facts that ultimately lead nowhere. They ‘wrapped up’ their investigation having ultimately unraveled nothing.. this would have been phenomenal had it actually uncovered some truths in this horrific homicide.
Bunky70
4 out of 5 stars
Just staggering…..
….how little attention the murder of a young child and his mother received by the police. From the day of the crime it’s as of law enforcement couldn’t be bothered based on the location of the crime. Good investigative journalism i’m this podcast — and thank goodness for the willingness of the few witnesses who did speak up. Their bravery and compassion for the victims was heartwarming.
epotter2022
5 out of 5 stars
Captivating yet heartbreaking
This podcast very entertaining and captivating. It’s heartbreaking what happened to the victims but I think this investigation it’s a clear picture of what most likely happened that night. It’s clear the father himself or his friend was hired. no other logical explanation. I hope there is justice for the victims. It is heartbreaking about investigators don’t care about this case because she was an immigrant women with no friends or family in the United States. It’s insane that they don’t see her and her son as human extremely disgusting. blew my mind when he referred to a different case headlight on instead of this one.
Monie2929
5 out of 5 stars
Excellent Podcast
Thank you so much for bringing this tragic story to light. I am livid and will continue to follow the case. There needs to be JUSTICE for Sasi & Anish!
HugoDugo23
1 out of 5 stars
Too many episodes for the story
This would’ve been a better on The Deck stories. Each episode reiterates the same information. The whole “wait till you hear what happens after the break” and nothing happened was misleading. Despite all of that, I hope there is justice for the victims. They deserved better.
SarahColetti
5 out of 5 stars
Season 2 is awesome
We must solve this case. Excellently told. Betsy: rock star.
CHIQUIS.ME
3 out of 5 stars
Strange land
Fantastic investigation reporting where they have hanging at the edge of your seat the story is real and they are very excellent in presenting the story to you. Good music excellent rhythm one of the best podcast of my life. Sofia
Dave n Debi
5 out of 5 stars
Great podcast
Enjoyed listening!
Lara, K
5 out of 5 stars
Thank you
Thank for shedding light into cases that are overlooked. Season 2 was hard to hear, but necessary. I looked forward to listening in every week that new episodes became available, and I thought the investigating was appropriate and mindful.
ericandcris
5 out of 5 stars
Wow!
I am so intrigued with this podcast! It is well put together and flows seamlessly. I love how the next episode slides right in and you just keep listening, wanting more! It's smart and engaging. Highly recommended!
kimbsy
5 out of 5 stars
Very addictive!
This was such a compelling story! Thank you so much for doing this & trying to get justice for these victims. I couldn’t stop listening!
NotTMobile
5 out of 5 stars
Love it!
I’ve been fascinated with true crime for a very long time and had seen at least one documentary on most of the notorious serial killers by the time I was 12/13. I’ve watched thousands of hours of true crime shows and listened to hundreds of hours of podcasts (I’ve only listened to podcasts for about a year), and this podcast DOES NOT DISAPPOINT. I’m such an audiochuck snob that if I even try to listen to other podcasts, I end up annoyed and/or bored in the first 5 minutes for one reason or another. Both seasons of Strangeland were addicting. It’s obvious that they actually care about the stories they’re reporting on, and it’s conveyed in the way that they tell the story. I’ve seen a few reviews stating that the reporting is biased and needs to be more objective, but I don’t agree. In season the podcasters had differing opinions on the guilt of the subject (I personally think he was framed), and I thought it was quite objective. I would say that season two was not as objective as season one, but then it’s difficult to be objective and unbiased when there’s so little information to go because the police never actually investigated anything and almost everyone refused to talk about crime or the victims in general. I thought both seasons were absolutely fantastic! I’m hooked and will continue to binge listen for as long as they continue making them!
True Crime Listener 4
3 out of 5 stars
It’s an ok series
The first season is not naturally scripted and made it hard to listen to. Season 2 was better in this aspect. Interesting cases but not the best delivery, particularly in season 1
nicoleLB
4 out of 5 stars
Slow but compelling
I think this is such an important story to bring to light and hopefully bring some pressure on the investigators to name a suspect. It’s been too long for the victims to wait for justice. From a podcast standpoint- the pacing is so slow and I’m not sure why they decided to do brief 20-25 minute episodes (after the recaps, music, and ads are removed, is it even beyond 15 minutes for some?) except to increase the Ad revenue. Which is tacky when you’re making decisions purely based on profit rather than keeping the story and victims as your first priority.
doccvader
5 out of 5 stars
Great
Season 2 is very captivating & narration was on point. So glad you guys are giving a voice to the minority stories nobody else cares about. Going back to listen to season 1!
Hud.A
5 out of 5 stars
Excellent story telling
Excellent and truly appreciate cultural understanding and thorough breakdown of Its dynamic.
CaraFak
4 out of 5 stars
Season 2 is 👍🏻
Season 2 is very interesting and captivating. Season 1 is very boring and I couldn’t make it past episode 4.
14two
5 out of 5 stars
Strange land
Can’t wait for season 3
amandac6
5 out of 5 stars
Great work!
I love the effort and attention the researches gave for both seasons.
Bij1205
1 out of 5 stars
Interesting case ruined by biased reporting
I was into hearing about this case and what findings these reporters may have uncovered, however, by episode 4 it was clear they were operating under confirmation bias. Hearing them skewer a husband and father who lost his entire family in such a brutal way with no evidence of his guilt beyond his behavior analyzed under the lens of western ideas of how fathers behave within the family dynamic was really off putting. Ugh. Also, why do they think the police department is going to say much to reporters about ongoing open cases. I really had high hopes for this podcast, quickly dashed.
yogalili
5 out of 5 stars
Engrossing
This is the kind of case true crime junkies crave. It’s a rabbit hole that you cannot leave. I pray for justice for this poor family. A big bravo to production and this season’s engineers. Well done and respectful to the victims of this gross injustice.
TulipRex
5 out of 5 stars
So good!
I listen to a lot of crime podcasts and this one is the first I have taken the time to leave a review for. In this one they are actually investigating and interviewing. So interesting.
Cknutsoq
3 out of 5 stars
Started strong but couldn’t finish
Would like to focus on motives and reasoning beyond race. Felt like the reporters were only focused on that
Texas_MandyF
5 out of 5 stars
Informative!
Another fantastic podcast from audiochuck! I am almost through with binging season 1. So far, loving it! The details shared keep me engaged as if I was talking with a friend
amc56epa
5 out of 5 stars
You cared…
I’d never have known anything about this deeply sad story if it weren’t for your reporting. The blind obsolescence of the law agencies and the township and the county is palpable. Pretty sure you handed them their investigation by about 99%
mulgunha
5 out of 5 stars
Really good
Really good series . Love the writing and the story telling is excellent
Fatib78
5 out of 5 stars
Keep the story alive!
This is a great podcast, but it’s a heartbreaking story. I hope that there’s eventually justice for this mother and son.
Redvelvet1278
5 out of 5 stars
If she were white, and the police cared even a little
All the people defending the police seem to be unaware of two main things. One, they are public servants who work for their community. Two, very often journalists work alongside the police to help bring cases to light and keep them there. The whole investigation being botched is something obvious to even the most armchair of armchair detectives. (Crime scene released in under a day??!). The biggest tell was right at the end where law enforcement basically says flat out “why wouldn’t you cover a crime about a white girl instead of a non-white family?” Thanks for doing this. I hope that someone gets these people justice.
ReBL22
5 out of 5 stars
Great!
Great research and narrative
Strangeland fan
5 out of 5 stars
Best True Crime Series
This podcast is so well done. The investigative journalism is top notch, they uncovered so much new evidence to share with the authorities who were not interested in looking at it. I came to care so much for the victims in this case and hope they will receive justice and that they can rest in peace.
gigascott
5 out of 5 stars
Great.
Both seasons have been great. Keep it up.
aroskere
5 out of 5 stars
Justice for Sasikala Narra and Anish Narra
How sad that immigrants here on a legal H1B visa does not get the same justice that US citizens gets. They deserve justice. They were murdered.
Lyssa322
4 out of 5 stars
Great podcast, but it reaches
I’ve only listened to season 2 and I truly do enjoy it and the story is great. I also appreciate the culturally appropriate inclusion, investigation, and production. However…sometimes the questions asked by interviewers are directly leading and searching for specific answers. It’s not as objective as I would have hoped for.
gigi896
1 out of 5 stars
What’s that music in the background?
Would be interesting if we didn’t have to listen to all the cheesy music
S.Hanoon
5 out of 5 stars
The best!
I have listened to many a murder pod cast and it’s hard for me to listen to unsolved cases. But with this podcast the people creating it are actually trying to make a difference. Investigating on their own and trying to find justice for the souls that have left this earth. Keep up the great work and I can’t wait to hear more!
Nineth P
5 out of 5 stars
New follower
I love this show , they are professional polite ! You make followers feel the sadness like we are they with you all investigating ♥️♥️ and I even want to work with you all for free 🥰🥰 thank you ! Best wishes and good luck ..
Andrew111592
1 out of 5 stars
This show < Sword and Scale
Tired of the same race narrative from people who seem clueless to the importance of withholding info in an open investigation
KelleBelle410
4 out of 5 stars
Interesting Case, Biased Reporting
I really find this case interesting and think the show is great. The reporting is very biased and essential only supports one narrative for what happened. To me podcasts like this should be more objective.
Samwise1188
2 out of 5 stars
Hard to listen to
The male host, Ben, sounds robotic and like he’s reading a script. It ruins it for me. I can’t get past episode 1. I’ll give this podcast a pass.
Cleo Dominici
5 out of 5 stars
Obbessed
I listened to Season 2 first and got hooked (still waiting on episodes 10-14)! I am currently listening to Season 1 and I am just as hooked. Love how they lay out these stories.
Bendrash
5 out of 5 stars
Riveting
Excellent series. I was immediately hooked. The show strikes the perfect balance between presentation of facts and commentary. In this podcast, the story is the star.
KateJessie
5 out of 5 stars
Season 2
I am listening to Season 2 (will listen to season 1 when I finish this). I am amazed at the work that has gone into this investigation. This story is heartbreaking and the backstory the podcasters provide is so important. I applaud you for seeking justice for this poor mama and her little boy. This story is just heartbreaking.
7MaggiePR
2 out of 5 stars
Too much speculation!
Right from the first episode, one of the commentators speculates about the motives for the police and the district attorney’s office not to share information on the case as other than the fact that it is well known that active cases do not get discussed with the public. Sensationalism increases the amount of audience. In general, the technical aspects of the production of the podcast is superb, as expected from audiochuck productions. Content wise, I was turned off from the beginning.
scottywannadoda
2 out of 5 stars
Always about race
For once just tell the story and don’t push the race narrative. The story is interesting besides that.
misty blu14
5 out of 5 stars
Amazing
New to Strangeland but love it hope to hear more.. great job!
DeeGram
3 out of 5 stars
Marlborough is not a suburb
😂😂😂😂😂
Mebs1020
5 out of 5 stars
Justice for Mom
Great series. I’m tempted to google the case but don’t want it to spoil my podcast listening.
CMM MD
5 out of 5 stars
Excellent journalism
I am impressed by the journalists and the work they put into this crime. Bravo!
Jerushahh
3 out of 5 stars
Surprisingly culturally insensitive?
Am I the only one who felt like a lot of this podcast is really speculative? And worse then that I feel like it’s drawing a lot of assumptions about how people in the story should have responded based on a white American lens. I don’t know what the cultural practices are of the community in this story but I could easily imagine that it would play into their silence or the husband’s response to the crime. At best they are putting pressure on the police to investigate the most obvious suspect to the crime. At worst they’re directing public condemnation to a man who lost his wife and child, who’s manners may just be different from ours. I couldn’t finish the podcast because it made me feel icky to hear the way they were talking about the family and the community. It felt exploitive. I also didn’t like the way they kept throwing the police under the bus for not sharing information (in an open investigation) But I also agree that it’s a well made podcast. Entertaining to listen to. I’m a fan of audio chuck. Honestly I felt like this fell below the audiochuck standard of sensitivity to the investigation and the victim
Cyndi
5 out of 5 stars
Different perspective
I really like this show because it shows a different perspective of why wasn’t this crime investigation. We all know there is racism everywhere, but it goes to show you the depths that it will go when it comes to a child especially being so gruesome murdered. A definite to listen
nobody 537
5 out of 5 stars
Stories that needed to be told
Unlike other podcasts with crime stories told time and time again, this podcast explores the stories of underreported crimes of immigrant communities. Exposure like this generates interest and sometimes even leads. Really appreciate this podcast. Incredible investigative work
Dori8910
5 out of 5 stars
Great investigating!
What a great job these guys are doing. Amazing investigative work on a case. Nobody else seems to care about. This poor mother and child murdered in their own home. It’s so exciting the way they are tracking down. Each clue. I can’t wait for the next episodes to drop! I really hope the person or persons responsible will receive the punishment and the victims justice they deserve.
RDOGCD
4 out of 5 stars
20 minute episodes…ugh!
So I started listening to season 2 first and then started listening to season 1 because the binging of season 2 was about 2 hours. I really enjoy the host but I think Ben’s role in season 1 was not great. He was the investigative journalist and yet he was the one acting like he didn’t know anything about the case. Sharon was introduced to us as a director and translator. It just seemed odd and fake. His role is season 2 is definitely more as an investigative journalist but not the best because the two women seem to be doing most of the work. At least that’s what comes across. I would say season 2 is veered towards racial factors being an issue in the case, when it could completely be because of the Indian culture and the environment of where they were living. Where people wouldn’t come forward because “snitches get stitches”. I completely agree the police should’ve done more investigating right off the bat. It seems like people were willing to talk when the murders first occurred. Now it seems like a lost cause to talk to these witnesses. There needs to be justice for these beautiful lives taken too soon. But how??
Jeanielam
5 out of 5 stars
Great Podcast!
Just wish the episodes were a little longer. They seem really short.
Jowen1981
3 out of 5 stars
A good listen
Would have been much better if it came across more natural. A lot of the story sounds as if they’re reading a script, with scripted questions for Ben to ask, as if he’s not well aware of the story. Being scripted and sounding scripted are very different. I enjoyed it overall.
betterlookingsibling
4 out of 5 stars
Drop it all
I really wish it was all dropped at one time. 2 episodes at a time is wonderful, but only at 20 mins?? It’s not enough. Overall I’m enjoying it very very much!
TheLarkGal
5 out of 5 stars
Interesting & Informative
Well written and thought provoking. I notice reviews comment this or that about race. It would be naive to think race does not play a part in how a case is investigated. Statistics aside both seasons cover a case that clearly did not get the follow thru it deserved. It’s nice to have a podcast dig deep into a case and not just reiterate the same outdated information.
WA Nance
5 out of 5 stars
I’m Riveted
Why did nobody care? Why did the Indian community shut down? What clue/s were missed? And was this a dowry killing? I wonder if he just wanted out… I have so many questions! My heart breaks for this little boy, and for his mom, without giving away the latest revelations I can only say that he must have fought very hard for his mommy. What a tragedy…
michelemarie10779111
2 out of 5 stars
Do better
Both seasons - just make one episode for each. Having ads on 20 minute episodes is absurd - and then to make it worse it’s legit the same exact ad I now have memorized from hearing it 5 minutes ago.
Unwanted police officer
1 out of 5 stars
Amateurs
The “hosts” insert their opinions and assumptions that the investigation was not given proper due diligence. If the case is still active, then I am so sorry to break the news, but police can not share any details that could compromise their case.
Hallow bones
5 out of 5 stars
Good podcast
Explores social issues
JWM0314
4 out of 5 stars
Pretty good!
I have to say, I do enjoy listening. Very intriguing cases. BUT, if Sharon says “So…..” one more freaking time! Annoying.
Dapplde
5 out of 5 stars
Season 2
Great story, sad business and sad to say is the way of things a lot these days. I hope that the family gets answers, the police stand and pay attention, and that justice prevails. Thank you for all your hard work!!
SAV 74
5 out of 5 stars
Intriguing and for a higher purpose
Thank you Ben Adair for telling these stories to help the victims, their families and those wrongly convicted. Your method and approach is digestible on technical items. Thank you for doing this important service for vulnerable people.
bookiecalli
4 out of 5 stars
Good but
I give it 4 stars instead of 5 because there’s always a race narrative on these. They say if a victim isn’t white it’s swept under the rug even though whites are killed 5x more by blks and 2x more then any race by cops and it never makes news. Gotta start doing better about not spreading racial propaganda. Tells me your being told what to say.
karlee7
2 out of 5 stars
Biased
Not every cold case is about race. Stopped listening half way through episode one. Stick to the facts. Speculating about why it’s still cold is divisive. White victims are also the center of cold cases. Stop race baiting.
sk8dizzle
1 out of 5 stars
Not Great
Too hard to listen as they continuously try to make a story out Police not sharing an open investigation. They won’t give us evidence is it because it’s an open investigation (um yes) or because they are ashamed of how little they have done. They also am answer their own questions about why police don’t have many statements from other residents and blame police for not doing their job and then say no one here talks to police because snitches get stitches (if people in an area wont talk to the police then you can just blame the police for an entire high crime area). It’s just too many of the giant leaps to nonsensical conclusions.
rachel'sgood
5 out of 5 stars
Love it!
How could anyone not appreciate the lengths these guys go through to give a fair and accurate picture of some devastating crimes! I love all the details and the attention it gives these cases. Well done!
Chaz_coop
1 out of 5 stars
Fox Meadow
Fox meadow is nothing like they make it seem .. you would think u talking bout Kensington or Compton lol
Flakazapata
5 out of 5 stars
I love this take on crime!
What a marvelous way to do a crime podcast! I love the interviews, personal opinions, cultural aspects inserted and considered. I just appreciate this so much! I get excited to hear a new episode and hope this podcast continues! I am a crime junkie and the deck lover and because of those I ended up here and I love it.
SaraSabol
5 out of 5 stars
I’m invested
I love a few towns away from Maple Shade and have passed Fox Meadows too many times to count. I never heard of this murder, which is shocking. It’s also interesting to see an outsiders perspective of South Jersey. This case is fascinating, as well as heartbreaking.
Louielouie79
3 out of 5 stars
Second season way better than the 1st
First season sounds too scripted. Male host slurs his words a bit and says “wait” before asking questions… low grade journalism.
Rlagullana
2 out of 5 stars
Didn’t flow
The fake back and forth like a robot is wildly annoying. Plus it could have been half the time if it would have just been told. I just hate the stale back and forth.
ToggleBolt
1 out of 5 stars
Why is Ben on this podcast?
Sharon is phenomenal, but every time Ben speaks and says something that does not need to be said. Ben takes the air out of the moment and makes it hard to enjoy this show. Sharon deserves 5 stars.
ellee williams
1 out of 5 stars
not to be mean but
this podcast is sooo slow. it sounds like they’re reading right off a paper + doesn’t flow either. i’ll try again in a couple more seasons to see if they worked out the kinks. i will say, i love the audio clips added. great touch!
Frank the Skydiver
3 out of 5 stars
Too Scripted
I’ve only listened to a couple episodes of season 1 so I’m hoping it gets better. The content is good, but holy scripted. It literally sounds like the hosts are reading directly off a sheet. The “conversation” aspect is so so so so scripted it makes it painful to listen to at times. For example questions like “well why aren’t we hearing XX’s voice?” was one that stuck out as very unnecessary and fake. I’m going to keep listening. But I hope the scripted aspect eases up a little.
silvia2556
5 out of 5 stars
So compelling!
Both seasons are so thoughtfully investigated! Compelling in every sense of the word. Will keep you invested in knowing more about each case.
karamariee
3 out of 5 stars
Is This Podcast About a Rave?
Ummm I assume this is a good story but I had to quit because for entirely unknown reasons they put a bunch of techno music in the background… really distracting and WHY? Lol. I don’t know if they clear that issue up later but it’s a hard pass for me
Henny renee
3 out of 5 stars
Season one was good, season two just feels like hearsay and speculation
I know there’s not much information for season two, but googling some names and talking to people who didn’t live in the building at the time of the crime, or even know the family, that’s not reporting. Season two feels like asking someone’s third cousin whom they’ve never met about them. It also feels disrespectful to act like a family that has decided not to speak about gruesome murders on fb is somehow hiding something or being disrespectful. Everyone mourns differently.
anthonybevington
5 out of 5 stars
Masterful
The team behind strangleland knows how to build a story we both feel and hear. It’s remarkably engaging
Rjny
5 out of 5 stars
Great true crime
I’m from South Jersey and no idea about the Maple Shade murders. This type of thing doesn’t happen in the area often, so it’s interesting that it didn’t get more coverage. 🤔This show balances narrative with investigative reporting and shines a light on the immigrant experience in these situations. For Sasi and her son, there was no family in the country to advocate and fight for justice for their murders, and the family abroad’s pleas were shouted into the void.
aubreyalamode
5 out of 5 stars
Good stories
I liked the stories that were brought forth here, and your voices are soothing to fall asleep to (or not)
dukelovesjosh
5 out of 5 stars
Sad
Sad story especially episode 5 hearing from the little boys teacher and martial arts instructor. Broke my heart that maybe he was defending himself and his Mom.
Eddie092584
5 out of 5 stars
Amazing
Season 2 is a great listen!
Ayya Leticia
5 out of 5 stars
So compelling
Great reporting.
teatronich
3 out of 5 stars
He should not be a host.
Ben is not someone I can listen to. I finished the first season and had to force myself to finish. Story was interesting, although it did nothing more than bring awareness. No call to action. No resolution. Female host was terrific and personable. I kept thinking if this guy was interviewing me for a story, I’d want him out the door as soon as possible. I’m not sure how his sources perceived him, but I don’t think he’s the kinda investigator that can charm the secrets or true stories out of people. Ya know? Just too, WAY too dry.
SeeBea22
5 out of 5 stars
Season 2!!!!
Season 2 off to a great start. Quality observant details. Skyline on the new logo seems weird.
migsch1980
5 out of 5 stars
Season 1 was amazing and Season 2 is starting off the same way
I really enjoy this true crime podcast. They are covering stories that usually get ignored. The story telling and writing is top notch. Looking forward to to the rest of season 2.
Very compelling!
3 out of 5 stars
Kept me listening but…
Kept me listening but there’s a strong urge to show that this man is innocent and it shows. Unless I absolutely missed it, this man went to a few places to discard different things and one of them was the same bullets used in the killings and it really wasn’t talked about enough.
Jamey1559
5 out of 5 stars
Great insight into the criminal justice system from a very different perspective
I enjoyed the format on how you went through the case methodically. It was very interesting to see this view of the criminal justice system from the experience of immigrants and how cultures and different uses of words can impact the individual and the case. Looking forward to another season.
Jo Vro
5 out of 5 stars
Thoughts
What about the ribbon of the typewriter findings with the weird written passage talking about “lying in a pool of misery without happiness” and “need your arms to hold me, the cold sharpness that you possess?” Very sinister statements. Does this indícate that Robyn had an obsession with the wife or a personal relationship with her? I wish this would have been delved into deeper because it was just thrown in and not talked about. This spells guilt for me and stuck out to me.
jpro650
5 out of 5 stars
Keep it going!
I’m really enjoying this podcast. I hope you keep it going with new cases. This one on K-Town is very interesting, although those police detectives are laughable during the interrogation. I can actually picture them high-fiving each other in the corridor. The critique by the retired interrogator was a very good addition to the story.
Amoureis
4 out of 5 stars
Drop the faux dialogue
The content is interesting enough - just tell it. Stop with the faux dialogue (“Oh really? Like what? Tell me more.”) - it’s contrived and unnecessary.
1D Fan!! :)
5 out of 5 stars
So good!
I was so invested in this when it came out, listened to it 24/7 until I finished it. The hosts on here are great. It’s been about a year now so I’m hoping there is a new one on the way, it’s been too long!
danielhefner
4 out of 5 stars
the woman host is awesome .
Loved the podcast but I don’t think the guy host was not necessarily. The woman host has a great voice for podcasting and spoke clear. This would be 5 stars if it was just her.
Pikomagana
5 out of 5 stars
Worth every single second I spent listening to this!
One of the deepest investigations I’ve ever heard of, not only that but so very informative and educational since I learned terms and definitions From the experts themselves!
tv4420
3 out of 5 stars
Zzzz
Is Sharon asleep? Please clear your voice and speak up. It was painful to listen to.
algandphi
2 out of 5 stars
Worst Voice
This guy’s voice drives me nuts. Can’t listen to it. Nothing wrong with the content. Just can’t stand listening to his monotone trudging on through the info
Peterk3232
5 out of 5 stars
Amazingly done. Too close to home
This might be hard to relate to a lot of people who do not have Korean background. Having lived both in Korea and LA , however, their analytical approach to dissect the cultural nuisances within the criminal investigation within the 1st generation Korean-American community (so far season 1 ep3) is so incredibly well done and ON POINT. The story, and heartaches they had to through and going through are too close to home and sometime it’s hard to stomach. Nonetheless the show effectively shows how vulnerable the community can be to the predators and within the justice system. Thank you. I’ll be following your next work.
copakelady
2 out of 5 stars
Doesn’t anyone care about the nanny?
Never once other than to mention in passing was any info or attention or background given about the nanny…she died probably protecting the little boy…no probing into her connection to the family, where she was from or how long she worked for them..your podcast not only dropped the ball but showed her no respect..,
Ash1729
5 out of 5 stars
The gloves
You guys have anymore shows? You two are the best ever!
Bwgallo
3 out of 5 stars
Sharon was delightful
Ben, Not so much. Too monotone and added very little to the story. Sharon was great! Overall a good listen.
ASzelm
2 out of 5 stars
Waste of time
I agree with with everyone else about Ben, but I also feel there was so much investigation for nothing. We ended up where we started.
420!!!!
5 out of 5 stars
Investigation
They did a thorough job with excellent homework and open honest points of view
Im sleepless
5 out of 5 stars
Very Good Podcast
What the anchors do, quite well, is work off each other. They are far better at the double narrative than many podcasts I have listened to. It’s a solid working relationship that features one person more prominently, while the other person offers ‘feedback’. This system works, generally, during alternate episodes. The topics are interesting and are based on current or timely situations. They are thorough in the research, bringing in outside interviews that are directly related to the topic. Keep up the good work.
asklewoqskhf
3 out of 5 stars
Ben’s narration is terrible
The story is good - but Ben is painful to listen to. No emotion, sounds so scripted. Makes it hard to listen to. Neither one of them have any natural flow or storytelling abilities. Too bad too because the story is interesting but they ruin it
LT Gary 7
5 out of 5 stars
Love
I loved it!!!!!!!
alicefu0916
5 out of 5 stars
Strangeland
Just started listening to this podcast. I love both Ben and Sharon!
CassTay185
3 out of 5 stars
Not sure
Idk what it is but for some reason I couldn’t get into this podcast, idk if it’s the style of storytelling or the point of it. Ben sounds like bill from freaks and geeks lol
Zeegha
5 out of 5 stars
Great Podcast!
This is a great podcast. Especially interesting are the recorded interrogations and interviews. Keep it up!
privateye1
2 out of 5 stars
Good podcast but the music and background m ruined it
Great contact and stories. Well done! However can’t keep listening because the music is just too annoying and ruins this podcast. Ben also has a very irritating speaking voice. Again, too irritating to keep listening. Lose the music and you’ll Keep some listeners.
Mywickedvintage
5 out of 5 stars
Truly enjoyed!
Listened to this podcast while commuting to work. I was hooked immediately. I thought it was done well and was very interesting . I never thought I’d say this but I couldn’t wait to get in the car just to listen . Ben I thought you were great, you both were.
mad n meg
4 out of 5 stars
Ben Adair
Ben sounds lika a parrot/echo ! No need to to re-hash the obvious!! He needs to go. Please.
Eatirbiscit
5 out of 5 stars
Loved it!! Couldn’t stop listening
Ben Adair Sharon Choi The investigative work in this case was what made it so very interesting! I also loved hearing the hosts’ opinions on the crime at nearly the very end. I could see the point about how there could be something off about the way they have Ben Adair referring to Sharon, the, “I want you to, etc.” However, that being said, I do not think there would be near as much controversy with this, if it were a Woman in Ben’s shoes and a man in Sharon’s. My point being that, due to the current culture climate, maybe the producers could swap it up for us or shed Ben in a different light next season. All of that being said, my overall review is still 5 stars!! ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
koskholmams
5 out of 5 stars
Totally compelling podcast
I found the two hosts to be absolutely delightful, telling this story of the Koreatown murders.The podcast was very interesting, very detailed, it held my interest and did not get boring at anytime, and the hosts voices were pleasing. Recommended.
Scwilson84
3 out of 5 stars
Ben
Ben is too monotone
Miss Empire State
5 out of 5 stars
Sharon Choi steals the show!
Sharon Choi is what makes this show. As a Korean American, I appreciate the cultural nuance she added to this and actually would love to hear more from her. It was a little off-putting to hear Ben Adair ask questions as if he didn’t know the answer — I understand the intent but it wasn’t very effective. Please give Sharon Choi her own show and tell more stories of the Korean American experience!
cheygirl
5 out of 5 stars
Loved the podcast but why all the hate for Ben?
I’ve never written a review for a podcast before but after reading all the negativity about Ben Adair, I thought I should chime in. I think he was a great addition and worked well with Sharon. He does have a unique voice but it doesn’t bother me at all. He seemed very natural behind the mic.
2 Lil Monkeys!!!
4 out of 5 stars
Compelling storytelling
The story was compelling, but was difficult to listen to. Not sure what Ben Adair brings to this podcast besides annoying mansplaining. Hope they drop him for Season 2.
Kdclenney
4 out of 5 stars
Very Interesting!
I would’ve given this 5 stars for all Sharon did in investigating and interviewing, especially with the interrogation expert. But Ben’s voice is annoying and he doesn’t add much to the podcast in my opinion. Kind of reminiscent of Crime Junkie’s cohost in the fact that their voices are grating and all they really add is voicing what the listeners are thinking.
Happy tot
5 out of 5 stars
Interesting
Good listen
Quest_Author
1 out of 5 stars
Annoying dialogue
Could have done without Ben, no offense. He just didn’t add anything. The very scripted dialogue and poor, lackluster acting made it too cringe for me to get past the first episode.
Curious CJ
5 out of 5 stars
Interesting case
Loved both Sharon and Ben. Besides their investigation and analysis, their voices are very pleasant. Well written, we’ll done!
pattiroppo
3 out of 5 stars
Just one host, please!
It sounds like Ben’s voice was mixed into the narrative somehow. It doesn’t sound like a natural conversation between him and Sharon, and that is distracting. Too bad, because it’s a compelling series!
eesecole
4 out of 5 stars
Good Investigating, Just Cut Ben Adair Out
Sharon Choi should lead the podcast as main host. She’s the translator and main investigator. Ben Adair doesn’t add much. He’s there to make the cadence seem like a back and forth conversation between the two. It doesn’t really work here; not organic. He should just step back.
crimejunkie man
1 out of 5 stars
Male host
The guy that co hosts this podcast Ben, sounds like a idiot. He is the worst part of the show. I probably won’t listen to another season because of him. Absolutely terrible.
tinytells
4 out of 5 stars
Ben Adair takes it down a few levels
It turns out a white guy pretending he doesn’t know anything at all while coattailing on a much more competent woman of color is just as annoying as a white guy pretending he knows everything and coattailing on a woman of color. Sharon Choi is awesome. Adair just should not have inserted himself into the storytelling and should have just played producer. His wooden, contrived Socratic dialogue is a major drag on the forward motion of the story. That said the reporting is great, the writing is great and the production is excellent. Really compelling investigative storytelling.
hnwood1
3 out of 5 stars
Narrative needs work
I like the content and the research presented, but the narrators need work on the “scripted acting”. It’s painful as if you were in a high school play and forced to act. I may be biased because crime Junkie does such a great job at telling a story without seeming as such.
Silly beans in a hotdog
5 out of 5 stars
Amazing
This is absolutely amazing. I love this show so much. They give all the facts and no bias. They give every detail, and seek every option.
ENB MAMA
5 out of 5 stars
Loved it
Fantastic podcast, I binged listened to it in two days while running. Great hosts, loved the back and fourth between the hosts, I felt like we were all figuring out the mystery together. I hope the innocence project gets us a answer!!
nancymil
5 out of 5 stars
Well told
I listen to a lot of podcast so I have a good sampling for comparison on production, narration, writing. This was well done on all counts.
vsjehgfjfhjdg
5 out of 5 stars
Great!
Loved it! Learned a lot about the Korean culture and then tuned in to the Jordan Harbinger show which was advertised and listened to his interview with Yeonmi Park which was fantastic and then read her book! Win win all around!
Todddotcom
1 out of 5 stars
So scripted, painful banter
Why do hosts go back and forth with each other? It’s so unnatural and annoying - boring story that was anticlimactic
Geliotfan
3 out of 5 stars
Nothing special..
An interesting story for sure but the podcast is overly-long and the production is amateurish. There’s a lot of talking without really going anywhere and very little to learn.
Sstinds
5 out of 5 stars
Should be 5 stars
Great podcast !!! Real good listen
tttv2020
5 out of 5 stars
Good listen!
Season one of this podcast was an easy listen. Sharon may be one of my new favorite podcasters; her voice and personality is smooth and keeps you engaged! I enjoyed how this podcast was laid out and questions were asked and then discussed (similar to Crime Junkie). Looking forward to more seasons and updates on Robin Cho’s case.
Jessbowkel
1 out of 5 stars
Strangeland
Painfully scripted.
rissyroo703
4 out of 5 stars
Great story so far
Love the case, but the commercials are super annoying. It’s nice I can fast forward through them however it really breaks the focus on the story having too many long breaks in the middle. If you must advertise, try doing it in the beginning or the end of the episode please! This doesn’t ruin the feeling of the story being broken :)
aeaster54
3 out of 5 stars
Took the ride
Really interesting dig into the crime. Loved the personalities hosting. They did a great job. Edited well. I do feel that a lot was repeated. Probably could have been summed up in less episodes. Once I bit off 6 I had to finish! Got a little board with it by episode 7-8.
this app idiotic
5 out of 5 stars
Great hosts
Fascinating story!! If it was a novel it would be a page turner. These guys really know how to make a crime pod. You can really hear the hungry, shoe-leather reporter vibe in Sharon Choi’s voice. Ben Adair leads us through the story with patience and gravitas.
Janelle001122
1 out of 5 stars
Hard to listen to
They play way too many clips of the horrific interrogation. Commercials are extremely long.
Ari Ola
3 out of 5 stars
This case sounds so interesting but…
I first heard about this show from Crime Junkies and the case sounded so interesting so I immediately went over and tried giving the show a listen. Unfortunately after about 25 minutes I couldn’t take it any longer. The main male host speaks with such drollness and vocal fry it’s incredibly displeasing to listen to. When you’re recording audio to convey information, it’s good to make your voice sound as clear as you can and project what you’re saying. Hopefully the host works on his recording voice if there’s a season 2, then maybe I’ll be able to get through an episode.
Martiniano
5 out of 5 stars
Can’t wait for another Season!
I loved this podcast. It presented several perspectives to consider and gave enough info for me to concoct my own ideas of what happened. My heart hurts for the experience of those who were murdered.
jenkins_satx
5 out of 5 stars
Good Investigation & Reporting
The hosts were fabulous. The story was well researched and presented. I liked the various episodes focusing on the various aspects. Very impressed with going the distance and getting the hair DNA tested. Good discussions with those involved in the case. I learned a lot!
CJListens1
5 out of 5 stars
100% Hooked
Love this podcast. Each episode is thorough and I found the conversation between the two hosts helpful. Looking forward to what’s next.
Whooya624
1 out of 5 stars
did not like the story
I knew Robin Cho personally and he is a very smart sociopath. The story did not include this part to make the listeners believe Robin’s innocence. This can be very dangerous.
bdienu
5 out of 5 stars
Amazing
I like how it was the same story with 10 episodes. Great details. Please keep it coming!
Shane&Jess
5 out of 5 stars
So GOOD
Couldn’t turn it off! So so good! Hope there is follow up on this case!
It's meee Stef
5 out of 5 stars
Love this podcast
I listened to the entire season in 2 days I love your podcast can’t wait til season 2.
KBO13425
5 out of 5 stars
Bravo!
Well done. I liked the flow of the story and the hosts’ insight.
switchbac
1 out of 5 stars
Drags!
Listening is like being in grade school again with the back and forth of the interviewers. Way too many and looong commercial breaks
Adjani22
2 out of 5 stars
Interesting case, nine episodes too long
The first two episodes were intriguing and pulled me into the story. Unfortunately, after listening to all ten, I’m baffled as to why they bothered to explore this particular case in this manner. For me, without unassailable new evidence or serious doubt as to how the case was investigated, prosecuted or defended, this type of serial approach isn’t warranted or necessary. I did find the defendant and his story interesting, the backdrop of Korea Town alluring and the possible language barrier during the interrogations compelling. I would have liked a more thorough investigation into the second suspect and his motive. Too much time was spent rehashing an old case rather than researching new possibilities. The synopsis of this podcast is misleading; they never seem to take us where the police didn’t, as very few witnesses were willing to talk, and the new evidence is weak at best and hardly seems destined to change the course of this case.
Sarah1999993
4 out of 5 stars
Hosts did great, story was okay
Why is everyone saying this is too scripted? This is no different than Park Predators. The execution was good - not Crime Junkies good, but still good. As for the story, definitely not riveting. It was a little anticlimactic. Either way, the research and writing were phenomenal. Worth the listen!
BBabeb
1 out of 5 stars
Ehh
Okay story, could’ve been done in way less episodes. Female host could do this by herself as the script like banter is annoying. Feels like a “crime and court for dummies” explanation.
new dancerella
5 out of 5 stars
Engrossing!
Such an interesting perspective to think about cultural and language differences and how they would affect a criminal trial. Finished the whole series in 3 binge sessions.
Gurldawg
3 out of 5 stars
Interesting story but….
So far the story is interesting but agree that the hosts sound too scripted. The question asking is unnecessary between the hosts.
Deez Nats
3 out of 5 stars
Not a mystery
I thought it was well researched and produced, but the story was anticlimactic. It seemed pretty obvious who the murderer was. I’m not sure why the hosts kept acting like it was some big mystery.
freckles6887
5 out of 5 stars
Excellent!!
I love the podcasters, Their voices, how they deliver the message. I binged this series. Please do more.
flann2jenn
5 out of 5 stars
Thorough presentation of this case
Great job with telling this case!
thunderwhelmed
2 out of 5 stars
Weirdly hosted
One is reading a script [badly] and the other is way too casual. It completely ruined the experience of hearing about one of the more interesting cases in LA in recent years. Stoped at ep 6 bc I was bored to tears. Really disappointed.
Jsoda
5 out of 5 stars
Pretty good!
Audiochuck can’t miss! 🔥 All in all, reminded me of forensic files. I liked the way it mounted suspense. The hosts talked about very basic things at a truly relatable level so I think teens, tweens and even distracted parents can listen and appreciate this. Easy listen in my opinion and I just loved hitting back to back episodes while I cleaned my house or did yoga. I had no issue with 2 hosts (other reviews mention that) They had fine chemistry and each brought something to the table. I say keep it up!
audioprocessingiskey
5 out of 5 stars
Interesting podcast
For those complaining about the two host format: do you listen to many podcasts?? This is an actual format for podcasts. One acts like a foil who asks what a listener might ask. It moves the story forward in an interesting way. Super sad story about the little toddler. Killing a baby shows a super sick individual.
BobbyVice
3 out of 5 stars
Good story, bad hosts.
That pretty much sums it up.
Jessiii 😍
3 out of 5 stars
A bit boring
The hosts sound like they’re reading a script, which I get they are, but shouldn’t it sound more natural? When Ben asks questions that are meant to sound like he’s spontaneously asking the question, it doesn’t sound natural. Like the question was written into the script. Sharon could easily have just included that info without Ben asking it. I think the hosts also lack that natural chemistry that successful co-hosted podcasts have, so it sounds more professional. Maybe would be better hosted by Sharon only, sorry Ben!
appleacid
3 out of 5 stars
No need additional Male host
Good story but ruined by the 2 host idea. I think many would agree Ben just asked questions or made comments that were absolute not necessary. One host is enough. Having a person asking questions in between just spoiled the story. Bad idea.
bigggcarl
2 out of 5 stars
Fine
Story was fine. I binged it in two days, but I was really just waiting for something to HAPPEN. I’m taking off a full star for poor editing. There were parts of episodes that would repeat (up to 30 seconds) or skip. I don’t think it was my device.
Stopthefraud
3 out of 5 stars
Meh
Started off strong but the ending was so anti-climactical it made me question the value of telling the story at all
ericaammer
5 out of 5 stars
Interesting!
This is a detailed podcast about a case I never knew about before. I’m not sure why people are writing negative reviews. Sharon put a lot of work into this - especially in regards to the crime scene and DNA evidence. Good job!
Jennifer Chronicles
5 out of 5 stars
Love it
And love Ben!
Snooping Mrs. F
5 out of 5 stars
Nanny’s background?
Did the police investigate the nanny’s family, friends or husband/lover?
Shellsml
3 out of 5 stars
Loosen up
I thought the content was great and I liked all the avenues they explored but I thought it lacked in presentation. The hosts need to loosed up a little. I’m okay with a script but read it so it doesn’t sound awkward. Take a lesson from Ashley Flowers!
Semenic
2 out of 5 stars
Get rid of Ben
This would be so much better if Ben wasn’t part of the story. His voice is annoying and ruins it for a listener.
Dudu from FH
2 out of 5 stars
Not interesting
The narrator relayed each piece of information that was added to sound like a bombshell when in fact it didn’t create any suspense or wonder. This is not interesting and gets worse with each episode
Emimca
5 out of 5 stars
Riveting case
The case in and of itself is riveting. Sharon and Ben didn’t need to make it any more “entertaining” by speaking faster or slower, scripting it or not scripting it, etc. If you are simply curious and fascinated by human behavior and aptitude for a crime of this nature, you will enjoy the show.
Nhdhdnff
5 out of 5 stars
great show great layout
the story was definitely delivered professionally i felt like i was drug along a rollercoaster of a story that was well hosted!!
Ittlebittlebrittleface
3 out of 5 stars
Um…
No offense but Ben why are you here? Your audio is horrible you chime in just to be apart of it with nothing to add. Couldn’t you just have been a producer?
BeccaD81
1 out of 5 stars
Disappointing
Waaayyy drawn out. This could have been wrapped up in two episodes. The conversation was way to scripted and they hosts did not carry on good conversation.
MEE Ohio
3 out of 5 stars
Just ok
It was obvious where the story was going and there were no surprises or shocking turns along the way. Very predictable and not written well enough to make up for it. The story and female host are way too slow.
msmiklos
5 out of 5 stars
Thorough
I really enjoyed how these two traced every avenue of inquiry that was available. I felt their reporting was balanced and exhaustive. I liked that each landed in a slightly different place, in terms of their own opinions of the case. Personally, I was left feeling unsatisfied, because the whole story is still incomplete. The central mystery of why these victims were murdered, and brutally, is unanswered and unknowable with our present level of info. I hope this podcast helps to generate interest and potentially new leads to explore, to ensure that justice is truly served for all involved. Thanks, audiochuck!
Ray-Ray2927
1 out of 5 stars
Everything seems scripted
Maybe put a little more effort into your work and if you just aren’t feeling it then just don’t put anything out, because this just seems like something you guys put together in an hr and put it out to get money but this is complete steamy garbage.
rudvet2000
5 out of 5 stars
Really got me thinking about true Justice…was it served?
Loved this podcast! Working in the medical field all I kept thinking regarding the glove question was “double glove”!!
#1ColtsFan18
2 out of 5 stars
Decent
Interesting murder, but totally scripted. Sounded pre recorded and like it was pieced together, which made it hard to listen to.
yayformusica
5 out of 5 stars
Great content, good narration!
I really enjoyed this podcast. The case chosen was interesting and I appreciate the way the explored both the layers of evidence and the cultural aspects of the case. The combo of perspectives created a better picture for me to personally understand it, and - regardless of guilt or innocence - is a more complete version of this story in general. A lot of reviewers have commented on the narration. It took me an episode or two to to feel the flow (I was still interested in the case), or maybe they were getting their flow too in the first couple episodes. I’m not sure. Either way, I still really enjoyed it!! It’s scripted well and I like how they break down the episodes. Once I got used to their style it felt more natural. The female narrator speaks more slowly which just feels like her. If you are having trouble with the narration, give it some time. It’s worth the listen!
clusters truck
5 out of 5 stars
Robin cho
The husband had access to the area in front of cho’s car and motive. Look deeper into that.
mhobbs1949
3 out of 5 stars
Decent
Ben should stop talking. Very annoying. Sounds like child with the questions he was asking. Other than him. Podcast was great
jesse mcbride
5 out of 5 stars
I loved Strangeland
This was really gripping, and definitely left me wanting more. I found Ben Adair to be incredibly useful in breaking down and explaining the complicated info and what it might mean. Sharon Choi was super thorough, and overall this is just one more example of how deeply bias can be embedded in our justice system even when all the players are acting in what they believe are the best interests of justice. I want more!
Lubby502
2 out of 5 stars
Male Narrator’s voice is awful
The male narrator sounds so nerdy and forced. He’s not well suited to be a narrator. Too nasally. Also the female narrator talks waaaaaaaay too slow.
TayTayClaire
1 out of 5 stars
Awkward
This sounds slow and awkward. The story line is and slow and drawn out in typical AudioChuck form.
whateverselena
5 out of 5 stars
Good story
It was a good story & I really enjoyed listening it. They did a good job explaining everything. Don’t listen to the voice haters. It was a good podcast.
ShangelaB
3 out of 5 stars
Good but not great.
I found the two hosts to sound like they’re just reading a script instead of holding a conversation about a murder. The case is interesting but they’re convo felt weirdly forced and unnatural.
nitrotitan2008
2 out of 5 stars
Only listened when I had nothing else to listen to
Interesting story. Getting interviews was great. However, WAY too scripted talking between hosts. It drove me nuts. Sounds like n did all the work and was way more natural.
Abcswed
2 out of 5 stars
Great story, REALLY BAD delivery
The story is interesting and even the script is fine. The delivery is SO BAD. Both the host have terrible delivery and it’s really obvious they are reading. I just couldn’t get past that.
Maxpodcaster
2 out of 5 stars
Fell a little short
I’ve yet to review a podcast but I am an avid listener of many different ones. This one started interesting but lost steam half way through. The hosts need to drop The Daily like cadence, it isn’t a good sound. It comes off fake, surface, unoriginal. There definitely didn’t seem to be as much research done on this story as in other crime podcasts. I did enjoy that they shed light on a crime that didn’t seem to get much attention but also think if a podcast is doing crime reporting, they should stick to facts and less opinion & speculation because that is unfair to both sides of the people involved.
LoveDatHoney
4 out of 5 stars
Episode 4; fix the slow talk, better transitions INTERVIEW PRO review saves all the stars
Narration between dude & gal — too slow & forced Let us listen to story & have feedback bits for sure
Linkylouhou
3 out of 5 stars
Scripted
Good story but the forced banter is rough. Soooo many ads and the same ones over and over.
Mathy teacher
5 out of 5 stars
Couldn’t stop listening
This podcast transformed my commute to and from work. I truly couldn’t stop listening. So well done with in-depth, nuanced reporting and narrating. Combing a True Crime podcast with the nuanced lens of an immigrant experience in the criminal justice system was so powerful. I can’t wait for season 2.
cchelsiosurfb
2 out of 5 stars
Horrible distracting background music
I wish I could even focus on the content of the podcast but not a chance with that disco tec background music. Completely distracting and overbearing.
Kbissell
5 out of 5 stars
Huge fan!
I am a regular listener of any Audio Chuck podcast and this one did not disappoint! Great job and I can’t wait for the next one
gigi896
2 out of 5 stars
Good!!
Interesting!
silkyshoemaker
3 out of 5 stars
That background music
That background music made me feel like a haunted goose was standing behind me breathing down my neck. So distracting and unpleasant.
htxborn
3 out of 5 stars
Biased
I really liked this story, however, I felt it was very biased. I want clear objectivity and I didn’t hear that at all, which was disappointing. I like the hosts, and I am still going to follow for next season, but lose the one sided mindset.
Audioiss
2 out of 5 stars
The reading was just so off-putting.
It was nice to see a true crime series dedicated to sharing about a historically excluded group. I’d never heard of these murders or the trial. However, the hosts s to work on not reading their script. Sharon is flat and lacking the necessary emotion to tell the story. Ben sounds like he’s trying to ask questions and have a conversation but is still severely lacking. Relax y’all. This is a long-form, verbal storytelling medium which means you have to bring the listeners along for the journey differently than simply reporting. Even the ad reads were rough. I hope that if there’s a second season, they’re able to make some of these necessary improvements.
Ivybmac
3 out of 5 stars
Interesting Subject but…
I really wanted to learn about this crime and learn about a culture I don’t know much about. However, I couldn’t get past the cohosts scripted banter and reporting style. It just sounded so fake and kept throwing me out of the portrait they were trying to build.
lkitch2
3 out of 5 stars
Mehhh
I really wanted to like this podcast because the story was interesting and compelling. But half of this podcast I could’ve gone without. When it came to the DNA information there were so much in there that was just not necessary. Very anti-climatic ending.
Steve Gordon is 234
2 out of 5 stars
Eh
Interesting story, no reason to string it out for 10 episodes at all. Feel like there was nothing added after maybe number 3. Ben is ridiculously useless and sounds like he added in lines after it was all recorded.
bentsaul
5 out of 5 stars
My new favorite podcast
I really enjoyed this season! It is such an interesting case. It makes me wonder if Robin didn’t do could someone already be wearing a pair of gloves and find his gloves and put them over them. With them being outside they would tear easier but their hands would still be covered because they had the other pair still on.
burritoblanket
3 out of 5 stars
Good Story - poor writing/ delivery
I really enjoyed the story and found it very interesting. But often times I felt like I was listening to educational television for first graders. Ben is not made for podcast hosting. He struggles with his script, his voice is nasally and his comments felt very dumbed down when listening to Sharon explain. Sharon carried this podcast and I would love to hear her on more. Ben…not so much.
Ssaarrrahhh
2 out of 5 stars
good story but hard to listen to
-bens voice is rough to listen to, very flat and monotone -lots of ads but appreciate that they tell you when the break is starting so I can skip forward -I feel that sometimes the background music is too loud and distracting that it takes over the words of the story
~<>€£¥#%^
5 out of 5 stars
Future direction
I think the killer is someone who knows both cho and the husband. Killer is a mutual acquaintance who though it would confuse the police by leaving a large piece of cho’s glove on purpose. The show should also investigate the husband’s mistresses further as there is very little mention of them other than police did not investigate them. I think the person who typed the letter pretending the give the tip is trying to misdirect the police by purposefully leaving very vague names without giving enough concrete detail to be helpful. Nevertheless the person who typed the letter has some inside knowledge of the home situation of the family prior to the murder and is either the killer or somewhat affiliated /incentivized to muddy the investigation
kat cliff
1 out of 5 stars
Meh ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
There is zero chemistry between the hosts- it sounds like they recorded their responses separately & edited it together to fit the script. Really wanted to like it, but yikes.
VinayTheBull
4 out of 5 stars
Interesting podcast
Story is magnetic; couldn’t stop listening. Narrators did a decent job, but can get better after seeing all the comments. Keep it up; don’t be demotivated. I wish podcasters don’t twist stories to make someone look better. The guy seems to be guilty as the jury felt although the interrogation and prosecution did a terrible job. It is possible he got played by someone who paid him to kill the wife and walked away because there was no clues/evidence in that conversation. Also possible that nanny stopped paying him stolen money after his bankruptcy and he got mad.
TheZoeBear96
2 out of 5 stars
Wants to be great, actually mediocre
First of all, the heavily scripted writing and banter between the two hosts is incredibly cringe-worthy. For being hosted by a journalist, the writing is incredibly subpar. Not to mention, he has one of the most unpleasant voices and truly has no business podcasting. The other host is some filmmaker and translator with no expertise in the field. It was especially facepalm worthy when they interviewed a former bank robber who “almost became a killer” (read: almost killed someone in self defense) to act as an expert on criminal intent for a wildly different crime. Some of the worst journalism in a true crime podcast in a long while. Also, the whole podcast drags along on a case that’s not that interesting and becomes bloated with useless interviews that go nowhere. If you want tabloid journalism podcast, you’re better off listening to “To Live and Die in LA”
Lillian35
1 out of 5 stars
Don’t waste your time
The producers were trying to find an interesting case that proves this man was innocent - they failed. You never learn anything groundbreaking and he still seems guilty. Don’t listen. This sucked.
smerb115
3 out of 5 stars
Constructive criticism
It is obvious these episodes are being read directly from a script. Relax. Just “talk” to each other. Use common everyday language tempo. The story is interesting but it’s hard to listen to two people reading to each other. Just talk naturally. Thanks and good luck!!!
daniellesymes
2 out of 5 stars
Emotional tragedy but absolutely not investigative journalism.
I think the history they are trying to cover is an interesting piece but there is absolutely no investigative/non bias production here. The storytelling is a bit amateur and this just isn’t… real investigative journalism done right.
Gjjhdnjhbkjg
1 out of 5 stars
Waste of time
Complete waste of time. The narration is terrible and the host are so biased. Nothing groundbreaking at all. Please Do better Audio chuck!
McNancy1
4 out of 5 stars
Pretty good
Interesting review of the case, however, it fails to take into account the numerous studies that have exposed flaws in DNA evidence. They buy into the theory that DNA is infallible and relay exclusively on the expertise of the lab where the tests were conducted to explain the results. By failing to interview experts with knowledge regarding the problems the DNA evidence they have missed an excellent opportunity to booster the case for the defendant’s innocent and to further educate the public.
OmahaNEShan
5 out of 5 stars
Sharon Makes This Podcast! ✨
Five 🌟s for Sharon and definitely not the other guy. He seemed bossy and over explained obvious things. I’d love to listen to more from Sharon!
Allensanity
1 out of 5 stars
A lead to nowhere
The story is interesting however after listening to the whole season I could’ve stopped after episode 2. The investigation literally leads nowhere.
bevster87
3 out of 5 stars
Listened from CA to Az
This was a decent podcast but I agree with everyone else… Sharon could 100% host the show on her own. I pretty much continued to listen because 1) I was on the rode lol 2) Sharon can tell a great story similar to Ashley. Can’t wait for next season.
Anicoleh
3 out of 5 stars
Love audiochuck, this isn’t one of my favorites
Felt very scripted, no very much personality or banter in it. Some of the sentence structure was awkward at times making it hard to follow what they said and forcing me to rewind. Not very attention grabbing and relatively boring. I liked Ben better and though at least he added some context and character. Nothing to write home about
rositabananaog
3 out of 5 stars
Cool story, bad delivery
Ben’s delivery of lines was comically bad, but the story was interesting so I wanted to listen. I think it could have been two episodes shorter, the pacing was slow at times
CaliMerri
5 out of 5 stars
Good Work everyone!
I really appreciate all the effort and attention to detail that went into this podcast.
aznspd
1 out of 5 stars
How did this guy get a podcast gig?
The guy host sounds like he is having a hard time reading a teleprompter. Sharon Choi should be hosting this alone.
Babee_jay
2 out of 5 stars
Tough!
Interesting story, but Ben’s voice makes it incredibly difficult to continue listening. His voice is just not made for podcasts and is extremely monotone and irritating. Not only that, but the things he says are so unnecessary, makes it feel like this is a podcast for grade schoolers.
MegMeyers5678
5 out of 5 stars
Loved it!
Ben and Sharon made a great team! Loved the deep dive on a VERY fascinating case. Can’t wait for season 2- keep up the good work!
Hichickenpeople115801
3 out of 5 stars
Robotic but informative
Honestly would be so much better if they didn’t sound so robotic and scripted :/ was hoping to continue listening but can’t get over that fact
Sales Rep 15
3 out of 5 stars
Decent
Great, interesting crime podcast & content. But the narrating made it really hard to listen to. They need to try sounding more natural and not like they’re reading from a script.
zandemha91
3 out of 5 stars
The frequency of ads is too much!
Podcast is great, but 2 ads every 5 min for a 30 min show is so annoying. I got more annoyed of the hearing the same ads then the actual case!
Not a fan anymore - yuck
5 out of 5 stars
Amazing story incredibly told
What an amazing story with so many twists and turns! Everything about this podcast is so well done — the hosts are brilliant and set the perfect tone, the guests are so insightful and the story just goes so many unexpected places. I loved learning about koreatown and immigrant cultures. More seasons please!!!
Abigail Scholar
5 out of 5 stars
Could not stop listening!!!
This podcast was awesome. Both hosts were measured in their research presentation and my husband and I found their voices soothing in what is a very frightening true crime story. I have to admit that we could not stop listening. We each had one air pod in (sorry they were raycons YET) and listened to the whole thing on a road trip while our kids was given music to listen to. I can’t wait for season 2. I hope they have one!!
Rebecca0719
3 out of 5 stars
Just ok
I agree with others… not a big fan of Ben. His voice is not as pleasant to listen to. Sharon was better, but also definitely sounds like she’s reading from a script quite often. I think the same info could’ve been delivered in less episodes. The background music was also odd at times. It didn’t match the conversation. Lastly, I am not a fan of podcasts where they constantly say “coming up after the break.” I don’t mind the ads, but announcing breaks ruins the flow of the story telling for me.
Raveka
4 out of 5 stars
Great story, too much interview time
The story is interesting and the narration is good. It is also valuable to hear the cultural context and adds to the mystery. I become tired of listening to interview excerpts and wish this was more carefully edited and there are times I’ve almost stopped listening because of it.
Daytrippin08
5 out of 5 stars
New favorite!!
I love the two narrators. The story and their take is compelling and thought provoking.
citylawyer
5 out of 5 stars
citylawyer
Struck me as highly balanced, thoughtful analysis of an extraordinarily ambiguous set of facts. The comment on “bias” is especially hard to understand, so much so that I cannot even tell which side the bias supposedly favors. The big disappointment is the absence of a Hollywood ending that wraps up with a satisfying explanation (hardly the fault of the writers though), which I suppose makes the story told by the podcast that much more true to life.
lilysharif
5 out of 5 stars
Favorite podcast
I love the journalists, their story telling is so easy to follow! Please do more!!
mwpdisney
1 out of 5 stars
GET RID OF BEN
OMG I feel like I’m reliving the Crime Junkie🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️. Ben is the new Brit and NO one can stand Brits voice. The dialog between Ben and Sharon is painful to listen to, I mean PAINFUL!!! Sharon has a FANTASTIC podcast voice and would be great by herself.
michmone
3 out of 5 stars
Roos scripted and “produced”
And was never convinced that the hosts didn’t already have bias for the outcome. Not very compelling, tbh
clos801
1 out of 5 stars
Could have been great.
Ben single handedly ruins the podcast. His voice is very annoying, and he over explains everything.
#nowretired
1 out of 5 stars
Junk
I expected more from Audiochuck. Editing was VERY poor. A couple of the episodes just ended in the middle of a sentence, I mean why would you do that. Very disappointing and after all that (10 episodes) we finished in the same place we started. 👎👎👎
sadlistner
1 out of 5 stars
Sad
Started the first ep and couldn’t make it more than a minute in. Not the best choice in hosts and so scripted sounding.
Jay!928
2 out of 5 stars
Nothing special
Really didn’t find the subject matter terribly interesting and thought the cohost, Ben, detracted from the show. His tone and delivery bothered me throughout the episodes.
Ceeejo
1 out of 5 stars
Too drawn out
The “breaks” take up so much of each episode. Prolly about 1/3 of the time. After fast forwarding through the commercials I was done with each episode in about 15 minutes. This whole story could’ve been done in an hour long podcast. Very underwhelming story as well.
s40179
5 out of 5 stars
Love the idea and delivery
Great idea to mix culture and try crime, I hope to gleam more in the future! Enunciation and sound quality are good too.
gsharif
5 out of 5 stars
Best podcast ever
So easy to listen, follow along, and clear. I love the narrators. Can you please do more podcasts like this? My favorite of all time because the narrators are that good. Obsessed.
Wep25
3 out of 5 stars
Quite forced
Mildly interesting. Very one-sided to the point of silliness. Treats the defendant as if he’s a misunderstood waif, when he’s actually a convicted felon who conned people to try to get rich. Would have been a better story if one of these dreary script readings had a harder edge and stuck to reality.
frimport
3 out of 5 stars
Good show, terrible hosts interaction.
It was an interesting show to follow. But the way the hosts “interact” with each other is clearly recorded separately, making it entirely phony-sounding. I would actually argue that the female narrator could do this thing on her own. She did all the work after all, and his interruptions are mostly irrelevant or do not add anything to the story. Shame, it’d otherwise be an awesome show.
Akspeechteach
4 out of 5 stars
Ben has got to go
The podcast is very interesting and I can’t wait to listen to all the episodes. I LOVE Sharon Choi, but Ben’s voice is irritating and his comments sound like he’s reading (badly) off of note cards. This podcast would be soooo much better just with Sharon.
lynn1990$
4 out of 5 stars
Guilty or innocent
I enjoyed listening to this podcast! I do believe that they got the correct person.
NotJoshuaWayneB
1 out of 5 stars
Bland
Although it’s a good story, the way they tell the story is very bland. No personality whatsoever.
h_kingg
3 out of 5 stars
So Bias
This is the most bias podcast I’ve heard in a long time. Shocking since audiochuck productions typically show both sides of a story. But this is not the case. However it’s interesting and displayed cultural differences fairly well. Overall, I wish they had at least one episode or even some time to convey a different side to the story.
Anna_Moore
2 out of 5 stars
The hosting sounds so familiar…
About halfway through the first episode it hit me - Ben is the Brit to Sharon’s Ashley. (Crime Junkies will get it.) The only thing that Ben brings to this podcast is stating obvious facts and observations and taking something that Sharon LITERALLY JUST SAID and making it into a question. It feels so scripted and the constant surprised tone when Ben is asking questions gets annoying fast. I’m going to try and continue with the rest of the episodes because this case is very interesting but I’m doubtful that the hosting will get much better.
Pam-Brockton
5 out of 5 stars
Extremely well done
This is the best crime podcast to come along in a while. Lots of details and great use of original materials and parties in the case. Really excellent!!
crime-fever
3 out of 5 stars
Slow and basic
They treat the listener like children in-able to follow a case. It’s slow and several episodes sit on the same thing. I had to stop halfway through.
tb23tb24
2 out of 5 stars
Pass
The girl does a good job talking out the story. The guy on the podcast…not so much. Boring voice, very dull and boring to listen to. Better hosts would make this show a lot better.
BryNicole
3 out of 5 stars
Tried to love but couldn’t..
The case is very interesting and there is a lot of well done research. It’s extremely hard to listen to… it sounds very scripted (which is fine if it is) but there is no flow in the dialogue at all. It really just sounds like someone is on the sideline commentating. I wish I could get through the rest of it.
Recycle Freak5
3 out of 5 stars
Reporting Bias Ruins Case
This is an interesting podcast, I like the discussion about Korean immigrants and their experience. However the podcasters are so biased that it’s kind of irritating. They sort of glaze over facts that don’t fit their narrative. I’m finding that aspect to be very annoying, I can really only stand to listen to one podcast a day.
Lfaulk
2 out of 5 stars
Off to a good start but hosts not great
The “banter” between hosts sounds like they are just reading off a script and acting. It was off to a good start and I had high hopes but these folks cannot podcast. Everything Ben says sounds like he is acting - it’s very odd.
YooZ
1 out of 5 stars
Hard & tough listen
Couldn't even finish the 1st episode. Hosts are boring & uninteresting. Delivery is laughable like reading a newspaper. I wanted to listen because the case seems kinda interesting but the hosts don't help it.
michelemarie10779111
2 out of 5 stars
meh
this could have just been one episode. ben also sounds like he's filling in for an actor reading a script. 2 stars for the actual story itself being interesting and bringing light to this case for the innocence project to help out.
Lonzo's Ball
4 out of 5 stars
Missing the obvious
Interesting podcast and I agree that the despite the DNA, there are questions about this case. While motive doesn’t have to be proved, it does matter in the sense it can help explain the evidence or lack there of. However, I do think the hosts miss an obvious explanation as to why a criminal would miss that his gloves are being torn and possibly leaving DNA. Cho’s an idiot. His financial scam shows that. He promised 4 percent return per month (per month!) which is impossible. If he didn’t start as a Ponzi scheme, it would have to morph into that as he could never pay that. He just didn’t understand basic math and investing. It’s not much of reach to believe this moron wouldn’t understand that his DNA could be transferred from skin cells.
Thexterminator
4 out of 5 stars
Sharon steals the show!
Sharon gets 5 stars on her tone, delivery, clarity. She’s engaging and makes the show shine… Ben, unfortunately, brings the show down several levels in terms of polish. As one reviewer said, it is kind of like listening to a 10 year old boy contribute and ask questions that sort of insult listener intelligence when a really amazing narrator is trying to tell a story. Sharon is the ONLY reason I’m continuing to listen (waited to review until ep. 6 because I wanted to give Ben a chance to redeem himself or improve, and it just hasn’t happened). Maybe he’s better at the behind the scenes stuff? He definitely needs to scooch over and let Sharon do the talking.
Kelan1
1 out of 5 stars
AWFUL AND MONOTONE
Unbearable to even listen to. His voice is so monotone it puts you to sleep. Not to mention the story that is all over the place and uneventful and again, BORING. If your going to make a podcast, how about use some expressive language. All I hear is blah blah blah blah blah. Horrible
V62*
2 out of 5 stars
Sharon yes, Ben no
Sharon carries this thing, and Ben gets in the way. Ben may be some expert in crime podcasts, but he needs to give the mic to someone else and stay behind the scenes.
Colorado Mountain Runner
3 out of 5 stars
Just okay.
With so many stories in the genre, there is a high level of scrutiny required. This falls far more journalistic than investigative.
m1ka0
1 out of 5 stars
The delivery was rough.
I see that a lot of people really didn’t like Ben. I just feel like the writing was bad and his questions just became irritating. But also Robin sounds like a kindergarten teacher. She’s obviously reading and reading in the way that you would read to a child while pointing at each word individually. There is no way that she talks like this in real life. Why can’t everyone just use their regular voice? Trying to have a “podcaster” voice makes this unbearable.
runningerror
3 out of 5 stars
Did I miss something?
Good investigating and telling the story. The interaction between the two hosts was too stiff and not how people talk. So either make it a conversational or strictly news room. I needed to know where those hair were found at the crime scene? Why were they collected? A bathroom would hold so many more than four random hairs. And secondly, I need to know did Cho start talking about wearing gloves in the interview unprompted? Or did we miss a question from the detectives? If not prompted, and Cho brought it up was it to cover his tracks, was it because the glove evidence mentioned in the heavy media coverage?
1sheek1
1 out of 5 stars
Robots
The dialect between you is so unnatural. It sounds like you’re reading a script. I want to like this show, but it’s painful to listen to.
RabbitBoi
1 out of 5 stars
Too bad
Sounds like they are literally reading a script. Story is intriguing but hard to listen to the reading every word.
JessLF1588
5 out of 5 stars
Loved it!
Binged it in a day and a half. So good and great hosts!
Foodie365
3 out of 5 stars
Meh
I enjoy listening to murder cases, and it doesn’t matter whether a case is especially unusual. But this case was purported to be extremely strange, and it frankly wasn’t. It’s almost like the hosts overpromised and underdelivered. Ben playing the “straight man” role was a bit disingenuous; he obviously knew the answers to some of his criminal investigation questions. I agree with many reviewers that both hosts sounded very scripted, which is a shame after they put all that work into investigating. The episodes get more dragged out toward the end. All in all, I made it through, but wasn’t blown away.
ItsSummerMarie
1 out of 5 stars
Not up to audiochuck standards
I’ve been a loyal audiochuck listener for years, enjoying almost every single podcast they produce. This one is downright boring to the point where I found myself distracted and having to rewind within episode one just to replay the same thing over so I’d pay attention. The male host is probably a reputable investigative journalist but his podcasting skills fall flat. He is monotone, unenthusiastic, and his commentary where he pretends like he doesn’t know the evidence/story when the female host presents it to us is just laughable. I made it to the end of episode 2. Do not recommend. Stick with crime junkie, solvable, or park predators if you’re after true crime.
YasDanni
1 out of 5 stars
Disappointed
I honestly thought it was pretty lame and didn’t need ten episodes. I listened to all of the episodes. Do not recommend. This is my first review on a podcast show too lol. Save your time. This was definitely a miss.
ayyfaebayy
4 out of 5 stars
liked it but the bias feels strong
strangeland was well-researched and interesting. I, unfortunately, sensed lots of bias. it is clear that either their personal opinion is that cho is innocent or they wanted to talk up the “holes in the case” to make the podcast more interesting. many threads went unfollowed and other facts in the case were downplayed to make cho look better.
Beauwkb3
2 out of 5 stars
Interesting case, terrible storytelling
Case is very interesting, glad it is being told. However I did not enjoy the way the story was told or the voices, sounded like I was being told a murder story by a 10 year old boy who asks too many questions
🔚🙉⚓🙊🚋🚋🙊⚓⚓
5 out of 5 stars
Awesome
Awesome
mattnellen
5 out of 5 stars
I really like this format.
I really like the format of the two hosts interacting/brainstorming about the case. Very interesting. Binged the whole thing in one day.
ChelseaLF
3 out of 5 stars
Good story but not sure it needed a whole podcast
This story is EXTREMELY interesting but also EXTREMELY anticlimactic. I don’t mind podcasts about unsolved crimes or verdicts that are questionable, but I didn’t feel like this podcast added any new information. I don’t understand why so many people are upset about the narration - it is scripted exactly how Crime Junkie is scripted. Ben is the Brit. Also, I understand that ads make podcasts available to listeners free of charge, and I want people to make money, but there are so many ads in this podcast that it disrupts the story.
papakila
4 out of 5 stars
Good journalism
Sharon you are a natural at this. Next time do it solo. The back and forth a la Stuff You Should Know just isn’t working here. Just do it all yourself, one host voice, one narrative, and let other people do the audio production. You’re great as host. You don’t need a co-host.
jbentleylyon
3 out of 5 stars
Not recommended
I am a huge true crime podcast fan, and I have listened to many of them. There are good true crime podcasts, and there are wannabe true crime podcasts. This is an example of the latter. There are podcasters who seem to think that the popularity of this genre somehow compensates for a lack of quality, and as a true crime podcast fan I am disappointed by this. I also do not understand why Ashley Flowers fans were given such an enthusiastic recommendation for a podcast which answers none of the questions it asks. The narration is lackluster and unnecessarily repetitive, and the podcast ends with the same results it started with. Disappointing and feels like a waste of time by the end. Good thing it’s free (because of the huge number of ads). However I don’t think that makes up for the overall product presented here.
WEandaJune
2 out of 5 stars
Ben…
Strong story. Ben’s commentary is at once weirdly dispassionate and antagonistic. Tone matters.
Retyrode
3 out of 5 stars
Great story with poor delivery
The story is great, but the delivery is clearly being read from a script. No reason for the guy to be there at all. He is just unnecessary and personality-free fluff. I think that she will get better with more experience… tell the story from notes and from your heart, not a script.
vanaek
5 out of 5 stars
Love
I could not stop listening to this podcast. If you like Making a Murderer or Serial, this podcast is for you. It's an intriguing story that I had never heard before. I cannot believe our Justice system sometimes; it's astounding.
Podcasts Junkie
3 out of 5 stars
Sounds too scripted
The male “narrator” sounds unrehearsed as if just reading his lines for the first time. Because of the girl’s voice I still listened to all of the episodes. Ditch this guy, find a new host.
Raatsy
3 out of 5 stars
Good story weak story telling
This was a good podcast story with below average story telling. She sounds professional and has a very inviting voice. He’s hard to listen to at times to the point where it’s annoying.
juliekk1978
3 out of 5 stars
Good content, poor delivery
I enjoyed the story but these two hosts clearly aren’t in a room together. Just pre-recording rote questions and answers. It sounds like my kids doing a group project and reading pre written facts and questions to a partner. Hope it gets better!!
JMullyDeuce
4 out of 5 stars
I like it
It’s good. I do think there were some obvious questions they didn’t explore. Like…why assume order of death matched order of entry? Nanny and child could have walked in on crime and forced perpetrator’s hand. If latex was brought to apt by other than the person whose DNA was on it…why did the real perpetrator not try to steer authorities to RC?
MeLo921
2 out of 5 stars
Why?
Why does Ben sound like he is just hitting puberty? If you can get past his voice then this is a decent podcast.
Sharontheborg
3 out of 5 stars
BEN!!!
Ben!! Work on your voice presentation. This would be a phenomenal podcast and I would give it a five star rating, but the forced questions and speech patterns reminds me of the co-host on Crime Junkies, Britt. Not a compliment and brings a lot of bad reviews to their podcast as well. If you put together a podcast (which in essence IS story telling and ALL voice) then you should take the time to really cultivate the art of smooth conversation, question presentation, and voice tone.
Justwanttoshop
3 out of 5 stars
Interesting story annoying format
I’ve listened to almost every true crime podcast since Serial. This case is compelling especially because I was born and raised within a few miles of Koreatown. The best true crime podcasts, in my opinion, include interviews and other audio to support the narrator’s story which this podcast has. What I find completely unnecessary is Ben as his role is only to ask stupid questions and make even stupider comments. This would have been a 5 star review if the podcast only had one narrator who it seems did all the investigative work anyway. She’s the one who’s bilingual and seems to conduct all the interviews. I really hope if there’s a season 2, they change the format and get rid of Ben.
ViktorKosarek
3 out of 5 stars
I still don’t see how this guy didn’t do it
The evidence suggests that he was a less than competent criminal. Well presented, though.
Pissbreak37
5 out of 5 stars
Great and addictive!!
But where can we find the interrogation videos that they constantly talk about!? It would be great if they released these videos or told the listeners where to find them! I can’t find the interrogation videos anywhere!
RoseChris85
2 out of 5 stars
Terrible narration
Sounds like they’re reading directly off of a paper. I like the storyline but I feel like I’m listening to Ben Stein (the clear eye commercial guy) On to the next
msLashae01
5 out of 5 stars
Love it.
I absolutely love it.
crimejunkie bae
5 out of 5 stars
Totally Bingeable
Excellent podcast with so many layers - culture, the justice system, dna and how investigations are run. Lots of twists and turns in this one. I’m okay with how “bland” the hosts voices are - they aren’t there to entertain just dig into the facts. An enthralling story that needed to be told. I hope we get justice for Mr. Cho if he is indeed innocent, if not he can stay right where he’s at :)
everydaytrader
2 out of 5 stars
Extremely selfishly biased
It’s an interesting case. Only interesting in “why”, not “who”. However, audio chuck tried to make a wrongfully accused “story” out of it. They didn’t search for any truth, they sought out the best script for their podcast. At least the victims got a 30 second blurb at the very end, while the whole podcast was a sympathy to Cho, a child killer.
trucrime2
1 out of 5 stars
Hosts become unbearable
I made it to episode 4 and just couldn’t hang in any longer. The hosts are completely stilted (the guy is laughable) and scripted. Unfortunately, the scripts they are obviously reading are terrible. If you’re 7 years old and never heard of true crime, then this is about your speed. Otherwise, you’re going to spend half of the episode rolling your eyes at why the hosts are asking such basic questions. I’d recommend skipping this one. If it’s ranking well, it’s just because Audiochuck is advertising it on their successful shows - not because it’s good.
Georgina Parros
2 out of 5 stars
Meh. Spoilers in review…
It was okay, it really seemed a bit repetitive going over the same info but never delving into new info/possibilities. The hosts seemed to put on a front about fairly looking at both sides but it seemed pretty clear to me they thought he was innocent. A few of the things left unanswered: Why the heck was he throwing away bullets?! Driving around to so many locations to throw things away was super sketchy. Did they ever check if the murdered child was biologically the dad’s child? Robin’s voicemail to his son from the interrogation room was so strange and then the son didn’t support him in court… what happened?! Doesn’t it seem strange Robin would leave a message in English for his son? Was there any truth to Robin saying records were destroyed on 9/11 or was that just a lie too?
minty098
3 out of 5 stars
Hosting
Sharon is great. Ben’s voice is not made for podcasting to the point that it is distracting and takes away from the story. Also the story would be more effective if the episodes were condensed.
RoserosesStella
5 out of 5 stars
Top Tier
This podcast is so well thought out and put together, both host are so well spoken they are so unique and balance each other out, I will give 5 stars even with the ads (as another reviewer left a rude comment about the amount of ads) you all need to pay for the time you spend making this incredible podcast . A fan.
Marvi02
4 out of 5 stars
Good show
I personally enjoyed the show and the only issue I have is a ton of audio errors where certain things repeat themselves and then I bet these weird skips in some episodes. Made me almost feel like I missed some things that I would’ve liked to finish hearing.
WIBadgerGirl
3 out of 5 stars
Good story, poor story telling
Like another reviewer said, it sounds so scripted! The story tellers sound so bored, unanimated, and literally like they are reading word-for-word. The actual story is good, however.
UnnecessaryOrchestra
2 out of 5 stars
Editing Issues in a Q&A Format Podcast
Skips and editing issues rock this ad-heavy podcast, slowly paced and overly “informational,” like they’re teaching a general audience. Not for me
Readdddddddd
1 out of 5 stars
Meh
Male host is unnecessary, ask dumb questions, is not a good story teller and doesn’t have the voice for a podcast. Couldn’t make it past the first 20 minutes.
Jgraham6
2 out of 5 stars
Poor delivery
Super boring and monotone narration.
Vtmom2
2 out of 5 stars
No real ending?
Don't waste your time. Nothing gets resolved. I was so hoping for a satisfying conclusion . You know you're screwed when on the last episode they as “ … if you have any information on this…”
lati91
3 out of 5 stars
A little iffy but overall good
I’ll be honest, I’m not a fan of Ben’s narration. His voice is a bit hard to listen to and I wasn’t able to focus that much when he was talking. This is such an interesting case so the case itself is what kept me listening. Overall, this is an ok podcast. Thanks for all your guys hard work!
mind pump fairy
2 out of 5 stars
Well produced with good technical quality, but not much takeaway or discovery
The podcast sounds so great in theory, but it seems that when the producers picked this specific case they did very little to investigate or further our understanding of what happened to three murdered victims and why. More or less this is a redundant and long recap of a tragedy and the potential tragedy of a man being wrongly convicted. At no point does the team ever suggest and follow any other potential suspect or go that deep with the community members of koreatown. I think they had hoped this case would unfold to end up being a slippery slope of new details and revelations, and I don’t think I learned anything new from episodes 2-10 that I didn’t know in episode 1. It sounds good, has a good concept, but I think there has to be far more interesting and outright egregious tragedies like this that happen to minorities in America.
katharine gia
2 out of 5 stars
Good story, horrible narration
It’s honestly like bad acting. It’s awkward and forced. The content is good which is why I am still listening, but it is tough to get through.
leahondemand
2 out of 5 stars
Boring
Most of this podcast is recordings of police interviews and trial tapes. The back-and-forth banter style of the podcast ala Crime Junkie doesn’t work at all here.
Sara413
5 out of 5 stars
So good
I love anything true crime but what I love about this podcast is the behind the scenes information they share. They break down DNA evidence and interrogation techniques. I also love how they try to remain unbiased and look at the case from all angles.
kaybby123
4 out of 5 stars
Confused
I really like the story line, but I would enjoy it more if the hosts sounded less scripted. Ben sounds confused and emotionless. Sharon, sounds like a audio book I fell asleep to in high school. Be yourself, guys! Stop trying so hard with the theatrics and bad acting. The murder squad explains everything in depth like this podcast, but they also talk like they would in real life which makes it more enjoyable to listen to because it’s the REAL them speaking. When it comes to the case… we’re stressing the dNA and making this a big deal on how he was possibly wrongly convicted, but ignoring the fact that he threw away matching bullets found at the crime scene right after his interrogation? That’s the ONE thing that I can’t get over.
kaitlynichole
3 out of 5 stars
Want to love
I want to love this so bad, because I love everything from Audiochuck, but I just can NOT get over the terrible voice acting. Sharon actually gets more comfortable in the second episode, and she would’ve been just fine without Ben. I’ll try to push through because I want to hear the story so badly. I’ve never been this disappointed in an audiochuck show.
GIngertea15!
5 out of 5 stars
Binged it
It’s been years since I’ve found a podcast that I wanted to binge listen to, but this one pulled me in. Thank you
maj524
2 out of 5 stars
Just have the woman
Woman’s voice is great but the guys voice gets annoying
Shocon13
5 out of 5 stars
Best binge in a while!
Great storytelling. Love the episode with the bank robber.
cwill1122
1 out of 5 stars
Not good
Ben is a complete throw-away component to this. Get rid of him entirely and this would be like any other middle-of-the-road, mediocre, amateur podcast
ycuda
5 out of 5 stars
Innocent?
Very captivating story. Based on the evidence provided in this podcast, I believe the person convicted is innocent. Episode 7 really throws shade at the prosecutors use of the financial crimes conviction.
Samawhaaat
2 out of 5 stars
Lackluster storytelling
Thought I was into it, turns out, NOPE. It’s a shame because the key narrative re: cultural miscommunications and the devastating effects they can have on people’s lives is important and compelling. It gets buried or lost through poor storytelling here though. The male host delivers his lines in comically bad, stilted fashion and as if he’s talking to kindergartners. Susan Choi’s perspective is a highlight and wish it would have been just her. Episode 8, they bring in a random former bank robber as an expert analyst on the motivations of killers and what he thinks of this particular case, and it was simply embarrassing “journalism” or whatever they are calling this. Should have been half the number of episodes to tell this story.
zzstephanie
3 out of 5 stars
Eh
The story is interesting but Ben should not even be apart of it. Very monotone and adds nothing. Can certainly tell they are reading from a script but I just wish they would talk quicker.
pretyyinpink
5 out of 5 stars
Great/ Sad Story
This was amazing. Well told, all the details and the explanations on the scientific vocabulary. Definitely looking forward to hearing more. Ms. Sharon Choi - very well done. 🖤✌🏽 amazing story telling… voice is defiantly for story telling! 👍🏽🙏🏽✌🏽🖤
Sademployee
3 out of 5 stars
Very Poor Script Reading
Ben’s “chime in” questions sound very obviously scripted and I almost laugh each time because it sounds so unnatural. The story is good but both of them could work on their script reading because it sounds like really bad acting rather than a conversation. Very awkward and kinda laughable. Even the ads are bad… one says something like “we think you’ll like this podcast because you like interesting podcasts”😂 that’s so vague.
pruppet mom
5 out of 5 stars
Great hosta
I really liked this series! Listened to it in 2 days- still unsure whether Robin is guilty or not! I hope more evidence comes out one way or another.
lareilll
3 out of 5 stars
Hosting
Sharon does everything. Ben is unnecessary and condescending.
thebigchung
2 out of 5 stars
It’s ok
It’s an ok podcast. The last few episodes definitely contain the best content. I feel like the first 5 or 6 episodes could have been condensed into 3 episodes or maybe less. Not really sure why Ben is apart of this. He randomly contributes overly obvious useless banter in a wormy voice.
Srvinhim
4 out of 5 stars
So many ads!
I’d give it a full 5 stars if there weren’t so many dang ads! Thank God I can fast forward through them.
Dewa0079
1 out of 5 stars
Not good…
It sounds like they’re reading a script at a 4th grade reading level and trying to make it sound like banter and conversation. It’s really bad. There are a lot of long ads. I’d guess 10 minutes for each episode. The story is far too strung out over 10 podcasts. It could have easily been compacted into 5/6 podcasts. I really wanted to like this.
deathhmothh
5 out of 5 stars
First of all
I need season 2
nicknameisalreadytakenx1000
1 out of 5 stars
Tired of ads.
Can’t handle the ads. I’m done.
Podcast information
- Amount of episodes
- 29
- Subscribers
- 1
- Verified
- No
- Website
- Explicit content
- No
- Episode type
- serial
- Podcast link
- https://podvine.com/link/..
- Last upload date
- April 13, 2023
- Last fetch date
- May 31, 2023 6:50 AM
- Upload range
- MONTHLY
- Author
- audiochuck | Western Sound
- Copyright
- audiochuck
susbcribers
- NEW SEASON: KILLEDEach episode of KILLED tells the true tale behind a magazine story once silenced or submerged by the media. Justine Harman interviews some of the biggest names in journalism and learns about the drama and deception that surround major publications' final decisions on whether or not to publish a writer's reporting. You can listen to KILLED on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to podcasts. To submit your KILLED story, visit www.KILLEDStories.com.0 comments0
- Strangeland Mar 10 · 6m NEW SHOW: The Deck InvestigatesDarlene Hulse was forcibly taken from her home in Argos, Indiana on August 17, 1984. Her two oldest daughters witnessed the attack but they didn’t recognize the man who took their mother. Though Darlene’s body would be found a day later, just six miles from her home, her killer has evaded law enforcement for almost four decades and her case has remained cold…until now. After a year long investigation, we’re uncovering new facts and speaking with witnesses and suspects who have never been spoke to before in hopes of finally answering the question, who murdered Darlene Hulse? All 15 episodes are available for you to listen to RIGHT NOW on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you like to listen to your podcasts. Brought to you by CarMax. Car buying reimagined. Find a car you’ll love at CarMax.com.0 comments0
- Ep 14 of 14: Six Years LaterThroughout our year-long investigation, Hanu has ignored our repeated attempts to contact him. So, in the Season Finale of Strangeland, we knock on his door to talk face-to-face. And there’s a surprise development in the legal battle over Sasi’s estate. Will there be justice for Sasi and Anish? Who should be held accountable? And ... how you can help. BURLINGTON COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE Phone: BCPO Main line: 609-265-5035 (& press 23 to be transferred to an operator) Public Information Officer, Joel Bewley: (609) 265-5777 Secret Witness Hotline: 609-267-7667 Email: Prosecutor@co.burlington.nj.us0 comments0
- Ep 11 of 14: The FriendThere was a third person at the Narra’s apartment the night of the murders - a woman whose odd behavior triggers some red flags. Could this alleged “family friend” be the same woman Sasi mentioned in her letter? We track her across the Philadelphia suburbs to ask her some crucial questions.0 comments0
- Strangeland Feb 23 · 20m Ep 9 of 14: The CommuteHanu and Sasi both worked for Cognizant - a Global IT company known for providing U.S. visas to Indian employees. But these immigration papers come with a major catch. As we look deeper into Hanu’s professional life - we find out more about Sasi’s secret. And we do a deep dive on Hanu’s alibi. Is it as airtight as it seems?0 comments0
- Ep 8 of 14: The Mail SlotA former neighbor of the Narras gives a first-hand account of the family’s troubling dynamics. But, he says, it was Hanu’s behavior in the days following the murders that was even more concerning. And, we get a crucial new tip on a potential eyewitness to the crime.0 comments0
- Ep 6 of 14: The HomelandThe bodies of Sasikala and Anish Narra were shipped back to India for last rites amid an inter- family drama between Hanu’s and Sasi’s families. We send an Indian reporter to Sasi’s hometown of Vijayawada, to try to find out more about her upbringing and why her family told the Indian press that they know who’s responsible for the murders.0 comments0
- Ep 5 of 14: The Drop OffMurdered son Anish Narra was beloved by those who knew him. He was his teacher’s favorite student - a super smart, motivated class clown. Anish’s karate teacher explains why he thinks Anish died a hero. And his first grade teacher talks about a strange incident that happened the day of the murders - and why she reported it to police.0 comments0
- Ep 4 of 14: The Inner CircleThe Narra murders divide the sizable Indian community in South Jersey. Hanu’s closest confidants at the powerful Telugu Association of North America (TANA) keep strangely silent while other Indian cultural groups readily assist investigators in drumming up new leads. Is TANA trying to protect someone?0 comments0
- Ep 2 of 14: The DivideMaple Shade is a modern-day Mayberry, but in the Fox Meadow apartments, it’s a different story. We go to the Narra’s home in Fox Meadow and start speaking with their neighbors. Turns out that “Fox Ghetto,” as many locals call it, has a long history of violence that doesn’t square with the town’s squeaky clean image.0 comments0
- Ep 1 of 14: Nice Town, Friendly PeopleHanumantha Narra arrives home from work to find the lifeless bodies of his wife and son. We dissect his 911 call and make some startling revelations about the crime scene. Authorities try to stonewall our investigation and neighbors of the Narras say there had to be witnesses - but no one is coming forward.0 comments0
- Season 2: Murder in Maple ShadeMaple Shade, New Jersey is a quaint suburb; its slogan is “Nice Town, Friendly People.” But on the evening of March 23, 2017, an Indian tech worker, Sasikala Narra, and her six-year-old son, Anish, were found brutally murdered in their apartment. Police questioned the husband and father, Hanumantha, but his alibi had checked out. Six years later, the case is still unsolved, and authorities won’t discuss it. So, we’re investigating for ourselves and discovering new leads, potential motives, and questionable behavior by local authorities. Will there ever be justice for Sasikala and Anish?0 comments0
- Strangeland Nov 8 · 35m Ep 8 of 10: Holes in the Case (Part 2)It’s courtroom 101: the prosecution’s trying to make a case, the defense is trying to get their client off, and it’s the jury’s job to figure out the truth. But how much of the science that’s presented at court is actually scientific? Ben and Sharon look closely at specific pieces of evidence presented at trial and find out that some of the bedrock assumptions about evidence and crimes… could be wrong.0 comments0
- Ep 7 of 10: Holes in the Case (Part 1)As part of Strangeland’s reinvestigation, Ben and Sharon have been keeping a list that goes way beyond culture clashes and misunderstandings. It shows that the prosecution’s already-tenuous motive for Cho is even less solid than they thought. At the same time, Cho’s behavior doesn’t do him any favors.0 comments0
- Ep 4 of 10: The Case Against Robin Cho (Part 2)LAPD investigators pounce on Cho, interrogating him twice in the same day. After hours of getting nowhere, emotions boil over in the interrogation room. The cops eventually arrest him for murder… but they may have missed their chance to make the case.0 comments0
Podcast hosts
No host has claimed this podcast yet, if you are the host you can verify ownership by claiming this podcast
© audiochuck
