Popcast

TDawgyDogg

4 out of 5 stars

The Guests Are Very Chatty and Opinionated

This is a great round table music show, discussing current topics about musical artists, genres, and current events. The guests featured are relaxed and casual, while still having valid and unique viewpoints. The host definitely possesses a somewhat dominating demeanor (interjecting personal jokes that are hard to understand), and the opinions occasionally seem deliberately obscure and out-theee. other than that, Popcast is an up-to-date music show that is interesting and educational.

Farkleton

1 out of 5 stars

Rage Against the Machine Ep

John’s flagrant ignorance is at times unbearable.

T Reade

4 out of 5 stars

Fun, Pretentious, Musical

I’ve enjoyed listening to a few of these in no particular order. Whether I agree or disagree w the critics opinions, I find their passion for debating and critiquing music to be energizing. Lots of great guest critics sprinkled in to various episodes and there is always at least one interesting takeaway from an episodes analysis.

Rcruz36

1 out of 5 stars

Cornballs

Listening to these cornballs talk about Zack and Rage debating if they are vaccinated and what Zack has done with his money. Oh, but the shows are good. Ben trying to rip Zack is comical. Ben, trust me, Zack is living better than you.

Gerbik

2 out of 5 stars

RATM

These meatballs think that Rage Against The Machine is corny.

LCutler1

2 out of 5 stars

The same album?

After listening to your criticism about Mr. Morale and Kendrick, I wondered if we were listening to the same album. I think looking for more of the same from Kendrick is where you err. Mr. Morale is complex, and I feel Kendrick continues to evolve. More of the same would be boring. I’m glad I didn’t listen to your podcast before I decided to buy concert tickets and thoroughly enjoy his amazing performance! LCutler1

Jtampio

2 out of 5 stars

Host is insufferable

I expect a certain level of pretension in music critics; I used to work with them all the time and most thought it was about them rather than about the music. But Caramanica is Arcade Fire level pretension and is insufferable. I love the topics but just can’t listen any further.

Ellis M.

5 out of 5 stars

Completely Addicted

Once you start listening to this podcast you won’t be able to stop.

Adammmm

1 out of 5 stars

Good topics bad host

Arrogant, uninformed, and smug, I agree that Caramanaca disrespects listeners, co-hosts, and musicians. His misses the point completely most of the time, mansplaining things to cohosts and listeners that he doesn’t understand. Hard to enjoy. Some of the guests are great; when there are more than one at once they can usually help steer as well as slightly push back, but rarely enough, leaving me feeling gaslit and unsatisfied.

marthie16

5 out of 5 stars

hire me

i need to be a host on this podcast because we think exactly the same!!

Cuzcarol

1 out of 5 stars

Those who can, do. Those who can’t critique

Listened only to one so far the one one Harry Styles and I learned a big lesson. The only thing worse then reading a review of music id listening to a podcast on it. Yawn.

Ichablog Crane

2 out of 5 stars

Tragically hilarious

This host sounds like Seth Rogen, but is somehow more annoying and even less funny.

ScSviolinist

1 out of 5 stars

Closed minded and smug host and guests

Please don’t talk down to your listeners. It’s incredibly annoying.

burt514

2 out of 5 stars

Practice and vet

I love my NYTimes podcasts, tried this one again and I just could not get through anymore. I agree with comments about the male host. The production is good though. The most recent podcast, as of today, was without the regular host and instead, two female hosts (great!) But, good god, the gentleman guest should have been reminded to refrain from saying “like” as a place filler, and “ya know, like” constantly. Follow the female hosts’ lead! Slow down. Stop and think about what is being said or just let there be a break in words. I was fluent in “valley girl” growing up in 80s SFV and I knew /know when to tone it down. Thankfully there was no vocal fry and inappropriate “upward inflection” at the end of statements. I didn’t expect a guest host fail from a NYTimes podcast.

fidgbear

1 out of 5 stars

Jon Caramonica is insufferable

Very smug, limited in his topics of interest, eager to interrupt everyone, and just annoying. Would love to see other critics at the NYT take over his chair.

Dävo

1 out of 5 stars

Gatekeepers

I’ve followed this show several times, and have unfollowed again each time. The hosts just can’t restrain themselves from being gatekeepers for pop music — the insufferable insiders for whom good music is too good for the masses. The height of their pomposity is revealed when they discuss Latin pop or rock: at the same time they misstate song titles and lyrics in Spanish, and joke about rolling their r’s, they pretend that their familiarity with obscure artists and producers elevates their tastes above mere fans. Ugh.

brinx00

2 out of 5 stars

The host ruins the show.

The first Popcast episode I listened to was the roundtable discussion on Betty Davis, which I enjoyed. Then I listened to the episode about Big Thief, and unfortunately I found the host for this episode (Jon Caramanica) extremely off-putting. The two guests were great but the host needs to dial it back and stop trying to dominate the conversation. Also, the constant trying-too-hard affectations and AAVE are very cringeworthy.

28 year old millennial

2 out of 5 stars

Rough stuff folks

I like reading Jon so gave a listen...it’s like listening to someone do a parody of a stereotypical, stuck-in-his-ways, defiantly Gen-X music nerd. He’s often speaking and reacting to a very contained circle of music critics, without seemingly any inclusivity or self-awareness.

shrugbug

1 out of 5 stars

The host is insufferable for a multitude of reasons

Unsubscribing after realizing i simply hold no respect for the opinions held by the smug, audibly unhealthy charlatan of a host.

smile4limon

5 out of 5 stars

Love the podcast! Needs more Shakira!!!

I love this podcast and look forward to listening to new episodes. I wish they would cover Latin American pop queen, Shakira!!!

hachback music baby

5 out of 5 stars

best music podcast on the planet

i’m shocked by some of the negative reviews here. jon caramonica is truly a gift — wildly intelligent, critically prescient, and clearly an empathetic and kind. he is a phenomenal thinker and interviewer and i do not miss an episode of pop cast. it is a special/sacred thing!

TinaDangelo

1 out of 5 stars

Torturous

This podcast has great topics but a very low substance-to-word ratio. It’s pretentious & torturous. Find different and better hosts/guests. (John and Lindsay esp - ugh). Poor quality for the NYT.

Kingcleooforange

2 out of 5 stars

Hit or miss… usually miss

Half of this podcast is the host talking about how old he is but creepily always on TikTok and other forms of social media. If he and the guests didn’t constantly draw attention to the fact that they are older than most of artists they review, spending half the time trying to prove their points of view are relevant because though they’re old they’re on social media… well, it would likely be more of a discussion of the music, like it purports to be. The other half is the actual discussion of the music. Generally the discussion half is worth listening to but riddled with issues. Though the criticism is often on point, there is a reluctance to just accept something more mainstream as good without qualification. At other points they veer off into reviews of music I’m not sure anyone else is listening to. I don’t have an issue with that per se—after all part of the point of listening is to be exposed to new music—but with all the unnecessary banter about the hosts rather than the music itself, one is left wishing they’d prioritize covering a broader range of actual musical releases that people would like to hear about. Instead of big mainstream releases and whatever random music the hosts and guests feel like promoting from TikTok.

Bagelforever

2 out of 5 stars

Good show, frustrating host

Love topics and questions asked, looove all the guests, just wish the host didn’t so often come across as biased, pretentious, and at times quite frankly mysogynistic.

lulubarry156

1 out of 5 stars

Actually Disappointed

I go through dozens of podcasts weekly and have never given a + or - review but their coverage of the 2nd half of Adele’s album bothered me a lot. It was pushing on racist. What about Adele or 30 makes you think she’s been listening to Drake (mentioned twice lol) or Future? Future?????? “Sing sing hip hop”??????? What is “traditional” music?? because that isn’t a genre. What about Adele being friends with Skepta is weird and why was that followed by the “Adele’s outside!” Aren’t y’all music analysts? Not to mention the endless interrupting by the host.

dbeegee

2 out of 5 stars

Hyper pop did not start with 100 gecs

Also the host has such bad energy. Agree with others. The podcast would probably have much better listenership if he was replaced.

Itskweeohstupid

1 out of 5 stars

AAVE + misogyny

here to join the many people who have taken the time to review this podcast and note the clear as day gen x misogyny just oozing from the pores of blaccent perpetrator jon caramanica. his vast music knowledge takes a backseat to his obvious and crippling biases, most clearly displayed recently when he went out of his way to make light of a female popstar using her work to process the fact that she had been groomed by a grown man/predator. humiliating that the times cannot see what a liability this clown is and how perfectly capable the many women he brings on as guests could be at taking the reins. fingers crossed higher ups become aware of this soon because without him, this show could really be something special.

_2020itUNes_

1 out of 5 stars

R Kelly episode

These are not “young women” those were girls. Do better. I mean SO MUCH better. This rapey language is part of the problem when it comes to violence against girls and women. An adult man raped girls. Call it by it’s name.

Vghjdsjjgsgsadfss

5 out of 5 stars

Great pod

Love it

MJLumbo17

5 out of 5 stars

BTS?

Hello why are you not writing about the pop phenomenon that is BTS? Or have I missed this episode?

mari hughes

5 out of 5 stars

One of my favorite podcasts

I love the fresh perspectives on music that this podcast gives! I love the different guests that are brought in as experts!

JohnnyUnfriendly

1 out of 5 stars

Almost unlistenable

Nearly every NYT podcast is essential listening — The Daily, Still Processing, Rabbit Hole, etc. This is the exception. I gave it a chance. I really did. The host has a great voice and at times is amusing, but overall he tone is condescending, pedantic and, well, insufferable. I hate giving bad reviews, but this one is a swing-and-miss from NYT.

bbbtour

5 out of 5 stars

Great show!

This is a great show with some really fun and interesting episodes! Keep it up! :-)

lindseylindseylindseylindsey

5 out of 5 stars

good listen

i learn so much! thank you popcast!

Everylittleheartbeat

4 out of 5 stars

neat.

It’s neat.

NJ359

5 out of 5 stars

Exactly what I want

Love the show. It’s my favorite podcast.

Chesley Chesley

3 out of 5 stars

Smart concept, clunky host

Great concept for a show, awesome guests, great selections. The host’s tone of voice and lack of ability to review music objectively is pretty frustrating, however. Someone else mentioned that it sounds like Rogan is hosting it and now I can’t shake that feeling. 🥴

perfumed_chain

1 out of 5 stars

Ditch the host

This would be an entertaining and informative podcast if listeners didn’t have to put up with the host’s obnoxious aural blackface. Look for the episodes with guest hosts - otherwise skip it. John is just the worst.

Cheefguy

1 out of 5 stars

If you wanna hear about jazz that advocates for change

And other woke nonsense, this is the podcast for you. You get to hear 50 year old men pretend to love Pop Smoke and Saweetie, it’s great stuff.

iamzooky

2 out of 5 stars

Why hasn’t the NYT addressed the host?

Just to listen to this podcast for the first time, figured I’d check out the reviews first. Almost every single review has a similar comment on the main host - misogynistic, condescending, obnoxiously bro-ish and not in a funny way. Like, in a really bad way. Sounds like a great premise and was looking forward to starting the new pod, but considering the majority of comments mention how awful listening to this host is, and the fact that the NYT has refused to address these comments, looks like it’s gonna be a no for me dog.

Julia Hope 22

2 out of 5 stars

eek

evermore episode was lacking

nvlv1328

1 out of 5 stars

No substance. Mostly just mean.

The host of this show spends about half of it just making rude jokes rather than actually analyzing the music. Do yourself a favor and skip this podcast and listen to switched on pop instead. They actually get into the music instead of serving an hour long standup routine that nobody asked for.

cxlee93

4 out of 5 stars

I just....

This really is a smart, interesting, and fun podcast about pop music. My biggest concern is the main host. The way he speaks about women sometimes, his words like bro, dude, man, yo, dawg, are almost triggering and the opposite of what I want to hear when discussing pop music. Joe Rogan has that kind of thing covered. The ablsolute best episode of this series has been when there were 2 female hosts discussing the Katy Perry and Lady Gaga albums. So much more intelligent and cohesive than the rusty current host. Content 5 star Host negative 5 stars

27jennifers

2 out of 5 stars

Sexist Host

John has always seemed a little sexist, but the problem becomes glaringly obvious in the recent episode in which a male critic, a female critic, and John all reveal their top 10 lists for 2020. The woman shared her list first, and John interrupted her incessantly, derailing the flow of her ideas so often that I just about lost my mind waiting for her to get through all 11 albums on her list. Then immediately afterwards, the other male critic delivered his list more or less uninterrupted. It’s really obvious that John is a guy who thinks his jokes, hot takes, and braying jackal laugh are more important than anything any woman has to say. Dudes of the world, stop doing this.

GayInBoston617

1 out of 5 stars

These aren’t critics. These are bullies

I’ve been a huge fan of the pod for years, but these recent episodes- especially the Britney one, are straight up mean. I loved this podcast for their appreciation of pop music. Recent episodes are no different from twitter trolls. Very disappointed. You lost a longtime listener.

JennyJenkinsNewYork

4 out of 5 stars

Insightful & Interesting When It Wants to Be

Perceptive commentary by people who know a lot about the music. But the episodes with fewer interruptions by John C and less self-referential chitchat are so, so much better.

parishilton42069

3 out of 5 stars

Could Jon c be a little less misogynistic?

Look, I love this podcast and it’s very well made. But Jon caramanica has some issues with female artists. Don’t take this as an insult, he’s still a very good writer and podcast host! But the insistence on calling Billie Eilish “Billie eyelash” comes off immature and condescending, and the fact that there’s so few episodes about female artists while Charlie puth and Ed sheeran and evening Justin Bieber are getting tons of positive attention is disappointing. I just think this podcast would be great with some more female guests and more episodes about female artists. Especially when pop music is such a female driven genre. Please just like respect women a little more!!

HiHiHi62

3 out of 5 stars

Kind of bro-ish

This podcast is pretty informative if you’re looking to keep abreast of important issues in the ever changing music world. My only gripe is that it’s lacking in female perspectives. I recall an episode where Jon and his co-hosts were tougher on female pop stars like Katy Perry than they are on male counterparts. Other than that, not a bad gateway podcast for new or old music nerds.

kendraslo

5 out of 5 stars

Amazing!

Amazing podcast! I’m in no way a music junkie, but I still nerd out with Jon each week. I appreciate that he cover the hits. I skip the other episodes...which can be a lot. Eek! Jon is the most lovable guy. He’s the beat!

dubscout

3 out of 5 stars

Sort Of

Sort Of

SMSCHI

1 out of 5 stars

👎

I can’t handle Jon’s sanctimony and misogyny.

julie anne w.

5 out of 5 stars

pop pop pop

love the hot takes

Fonzzzzz9

1 out of 5 stars

Annoying Sometimes

Sometimes I get the feeling that they they are contrarian just to be contrarian. Gets more hits that’s way I guess 🤷🏻‍♂️

jjammer19

1 out of 5 stars

Next

Used to love this podcast. Now it’s just them being mean and complaining. Next.

Zaqué

1 out of 5 stars

Get a new host

The host is so bad. He talks over women constantly and never lets them finish their thoughts. Why does a straight man get the privilege to host a podcast about pop music? This isn’t a genre for him and he doesn’t need to be here.

Nadnerb

5 out of 5 stars

Jon C

Hot takes tbqh

MJHarvey

5 out of 5 stars

Love Show + Request

Love this podcast. In these times of Corona boredom I’ve been perusing the Taylor Swift catalog. Would you be willing to rank all of her catalog and defend your rankings.

crazypetperson243

5 out of 5 stars

I love it!

This show is informative funny and awesome. It’s great to listen to and I love the music commentary!!

Me766bbeg

5 out of 5 stars

Jon

John C. is anti-prententia, which is why some don’t like him. I love his no holes barred takes

tollundman

1 out of 5 stars

awful. this is why I hate music podcasts.

i’m unsure as to why the NY Times insists on having Jon Caramanica as their representative of music criticism. his insistence on being “edgy” is grating, and belies his Peter Pan syndrome. Jon, you’re 45 years old; stop acting you’re like a walking “How do you do, fellow kids?” meme.

Gingersnap747

2 out of 5 stars

Wish I Could Hang

I've been listening for several years, largely as a NYT loyalist, but it's time to step away. The focus is oddly narrow, and returns to the same Taylor, Drake commentfest literally every week. It's cringey and sad when there is so much music being produced right now, good, bad, innovative and rehash- whatever - it all would make for interesting criticism. I wish John P or Karen G had their own shows, because the perspectives are articulate and educated, but mostly I wish that John C would stop trying so hard to be hip, stop the incessant snark, and stop cutting off others. I know his actual age, but I feel like I'm in the radio presence of a 14 year old boy whose trying to make sure everyone knows he's cool, he knows Brooklyn, he's lived in London, he knows more than any girl in the room, and he thinks he is so funny.

Lizzy Layton

1 out of 5 stars

The Condescension is Grating

I love listening to critiques on art, on music, on the nuance of newer artists. The insistent Billie “Eyelash” pronunciation — why? What does it add to the conversation? I felt compelled to listen longer, for the clever and fresh outlook by the female critic. But the dude repeatedly and purposefully mispronouncing Eilish — I don’t get it. I was hoping to subscribe to another music podcast, to listen to while I paint. Going to just stick to the respectful speakers of Switched on Pop.

HOT critic

5 out of 5 stars

Billie Eyelash

Why John? Just why.

loririr

1 out of 5 stars

This podcast needs a new host

I’ve been listening to this podcast for a year now and I’ve always found the host to be a hater who talked over his guests to state his own grating opinions, but kept listening because I do like guests such as Karen and Joe. I’m writing this review because of the host’s comments on Billie Eilish. I’m not even a huge Billie fan. But reducing her accomplishments by saying any teenage suburban white girl with a mental illness can become her...I’m in shock the New York Times would allow their critic to say those things about a teenage girl. The reason why Billie was apologizing for sweeping the Grammys is because of men like you who claim she’s only successful because of a schtick.

Sebestian Merryweather

5 out of 5 stars

Love the pod!

If you want some interesting insight into music and its criticism definitely give it a listen!

asdfsimsfree

5 out of 5 stars

✊🏼 Ashlee Simpson 👃🏻

Much better than all songs considered

nmalmanza

2 out of 5 stars

On the ‘Lover’ episode...

A word of advice— let the woman host on this episode discuss ‘The Man’! Consistently interrupting and speaking over her as she tries to talk about the message of the song is quite ironic.

Ze dance commander

4 out of 5 stars

Glad it exists

Love the podcast! Can’t help but notice it’s almost impossible for a female guest to finish a sentence without being talked over. I’m sure it’s not intentional but more work needs to be done there.

samshafer

1 out of 5 stars

A ghost of what it once was

Please fire the guy and get someone who actually talks about pop music. If I wanted a straight out of touch guy to talk to me about pop music I would ask my dad about Taylor Swift

rmg601

1 out of 5 stars

Ungrateful

All of the people on this podcast sound jaded and faded and tired. I consider it less reviewing and critiquing- mostly complaining and poking fun at everything they particularly don’t have exposure to.... and for that, I can’t take it too seriously. Sounds like TMZ.

rsilva07

4 out of 5 stars

Great topics and discussions! (If you can put up with the host)

I really enjoy the conversations that are had and the guests that come are always top notch! Jon is very cynical and judgmental in a way that makes the listener feel alienated, but he kinda makes up for it by the breadth of knowledge he has. I just wish he didn’t feel the need to remind the listener and interrupt his guests to let them know that

cynthia365

5 out of 5 stars

One of the best music pods

I love this pod! I’ve been diving into to the whole catalogue and have been consistently entertained and informed. My fav thus far has to be the treatise on Ashlee Simpson (parts 1 & 2). It showed how well-versed and open-minded and critically curious Jon and his amazing guests are. It made me think contextually about music and also realize how many bangers “Autobiography” actually had, lol. It was before its time!!! Jon is awesome and thoroughly passionate and he always brings on some of my favorite music writers and journalists — it’s so cool to hear them aloud. I don’t believe they’ve done this before, but I request a Lana deep dive if possible! Would love to hear their thoughts.

Daanab

1 out of 5 stars

Jon got to go

F###&$$ FIRE THIS GUY ALREADY. 🔥 NYT, you can do better. Nearly unbearable listen every time.

crazy for turtles😝

2 out of 5 stars

To long

That podcast is to long I can not just sit there for like an hour watching one podcast I mean i watched part of it but I had to do other things so I had to leave it that’s why the bad review

.....John..

5 out of 5 stars

Deep look at music news and criticism

10/10

Mark L. 5555

5 out of 5 stars

Dynamic coverage of music's changing shape

I've really enjoyed Jon Caramanica's efforts to transform this podcast into a more free-flowing, less stuffy dialogue on music that's relevant and deeper issues that underly conversations about popular music.

Tom Mikolinis

5 out of 5 stars

Has been great and entertaining for years

I’ve been listening to this podcast for two and a half years now and have listened to nearly every episode released. Lately the topics over the summer of 2019 haven’t been ‘as’ interesting to me personally, but I love the commentary and back and forth banter with the hosts. I think Jon tries to bring in more experienced cohosts when he isn’t as knowledgeable on things (jazz, Brazilian music, female punk pop). Don’t get let down by the negative reviews, just focus on what you’re good at and do your research! Will continue listening for life!

bumpkins Meriwether

1 out of 5 stars

João Gilberto

My first experience with music podcasts. I wanted more musical discussion. Otherwise, what's the point? They just talked about quietness and ended with ASMR.

Cmenges

2 out of 5 stars

Shockingly one-sided

I’m surprised about how the one-sided opinions of the host (and I’m assuming producers) are blindly accepted as fact or truth without need for consideration. I love The Daily and wanted to see what other podcasts were put out by the NYT. The two podcasts are worlds apart with respect to standards of journalism. The topics are interesting, and I like to hear opinions that differ from my own (ie Air Pods, country rap), but the lack of acknowledgement of counter-opinions is frustrating and not respectable. I subscribe to the NYT to support The Daily. I hope that none of that money goes to this podcast.

John zakarai

4 out of 5 stars

Thought provoking

I don’t always agree with the host and guests, but they always leave me thinking about aspects of music culture from a perspective I had not yet considered. Yes, John C. can sound like he’s Trying To Be Cool when he forcefully inserts the latest youth slang into his dialog, but the guy at least has a well-considered take on most issues and provokes his guests into a natural debate. Would love to hear more critics from outside the NYC bubble, especially when discussing aspects of music culture from the south.

ReverseMerman

5 out of 5 stars

AIR BUDS

Pedro finally on the mic! I’ll rate and review now. Five stars

skella1234

3 out of 5 stars

Air pods

Really did the listeners dirty on this episode. I’m stunned.

CGATL

1 out of 5 stars

Most annoying podcast host

It takes a lot to ruin a podcast about music, but the most annoying podcast host I’ve come across manages to do just that on a weekly basis. Get over yourself Mr. Caramanica; drop all your interruptions and everything else that you do to hear yourself talk. Give your guests and the listeners some breathing room.

KPDMGAT

1 out of 5 stars

Music is culture

While these hosts have clearly gone to school to be able to critique music for the NYT, the main host (Caramanica I believe) lacks any sort of insight on the culture that he soaks up the majority of these hour-long episodes critiquing. On top of that, the episodes I've heard featured exclusively male voices that unsurprisingly spoke of women musicians rarely and more negatively than their male counterparts. There truly isn't much substance to be found in this "popcast" as these critics are so far removed from mainstream youth culture that they can't accurately cover what the mainstream youth are listening to, never mind provide any real insight. It's hard enough to find podcasts about music that don't sound like they were recorded through a soda can, so it's especially disappointing to see the New York Times put its name on something so subpar (and that word choice is generous).

A gal with wings

5 out of 5 stars

<3 This Show

I love this show! I've been a fan from the beginning and I love all of the guests, hosts, topics on the show- really loved this weeks episode on Gospel + Rap. Also, Pedro + Headstepper you're great! I am fascinated by some of the one star reviews! We don't have to agree with everything everyone says on every podcast to still love it. Keep it up!!

queenfan050891

2 out of 5 stars

Fawning over anyone with a penis.

They need a permanent woman-identifying cohost. It’s ridiculous. Joe C will bend over backwards to say how amazing someone as bland and boring like Charlie Puth and then feel the need to say, “it’s not for me, but here’s X song” by women artists. It’s really frustrating and especially apparent in the episode about Kelly Clarkson and P!nk.

hyp3rballad

1 out of 5 stars

Pretentious and narrow-minded - don't waste your time

I listened to the Maggie Rogers review and was dumbfounded by how narrowminded and ridiculous you sound. Jon asked, "Pharrell, have you never heard music before?". Are you serious? He has multiple Grammy's and has recorded in various genres. Yes, he's heard music before. He wasn't comparing Maggie with Wu-Tang, as if they are "the same". He was referring to their uniqueness. No one in America is really doing what she's doing. PLUS, she stood out from the other students he had just listened to, providing constructive criticism. Telling them to find their own sound, as they each came off as carbon copies of artists they admire. When he heard Maggie's song, also a student, he was blown away by the lyrics (he complimented her folk background) and the structure of the song, from the beats, to the harmonies, and the break. "Alaska" was exactly what he was trying to convey to the rest of the class, in that it was unique and it was her own thing. Also, it doesn't matter how many times you've listened to the song, it's still a great song. Yet, these clowns want to talk about everything but, like gossipy mean girls. If you enjoy listening to pretentious, narrow-minded podcasters who think they're funny, this one is for you. If you prefer reviews with substance, skip this and find something else.

Brevardt

5 out of 5 stars

Relevant and entertaining

I super love that Jon C can have fun moments about Charlie Puth and then also go in with reporting on latest episode about Ryan Adams. Keep it up fab people!

robfrz

5 out of 5 stars

Caramanica is fire

This podcast is excellent. Extremely knowledgeable people discussing and dissecting the current Music landscape. Caramanica (the host) is great and smart. Coscorelli (reporter on sometimes) is beyond excellent. Cannot recommend it enough. I even listen to episodes about topics I don't care about just to hear their take.

bumbleis4whitepeople

1 out of 5 stars

Jon reminds me of that Steve Buscemi meme

I really wanted to like this podcast but it’s very cringey listening to Jon using AAVE. Like I get it your a hip-hop fan but for a 43 year-old, white guy it just comes off as you’re trying too hard to prove to black people that you’re “down”. I also tried to get into your actual NYT articles and lately every other article is about Cardi B. I can’t wait until Wesley and Jenna come back from their hiatus.

paigesometimes

2 out of 5 stars

Assumes You’re a Music Critic

Jesus Christ i’ve been trying with this podcast for a while but the only episodes i like are the ones with Wesley Morris, who is actually a good podcaster because he explains what he’s talking about. Jon Caramanica assumes you have the knowledge of a music critic when it would take like 5 seconds to explain everything he is assuming you know. Once they called Miasma the sound of 2018, and I found myself frantically googling to figure out what that meant, that’s when I knew to Delete from Library forever.

0000sarah0000

5 out of 5 stars

this pod makes me feel educated about music

But not in an obnoxious / pretentious way. Ily NYT popcast!

yakgirl52

3 out of 5 stars

Could be so much better if.....

....the host would recognize that the podcast is NOT about him. So many interesting artists and topics, and lots of fantastic guests, but the host just keeps getting in the way, always making it about himself. Too bad. Sometimes I just have to skip forward because of this, and occasionally I couldn't listen the whole way through.But at least we get to hear some Jon Pareles (who most definitely is there to talk about the music an NOT himself).

H-Santiago

4 out of 5 stars

Let’s talk about rock episode

Ok but what about arctic monkeys, no mention of them!? They have been the most successful and experimental rock band of the last 10 years. Each album number 1 in the UK, many accolades more recently 2018 mercury prize - sold out concerts all over the globe. Alex turner is the most compelling write and lyricist, his your rock star - he s a method actor he becomes a new character with each new album.

Jennyfromthe6400block

5 out of 5 stars

A great listen!!!

I love music and love the chemistry and passion of those discussing the various music related artists and topics. Always insightful and an entertaining listen!!

SaucieCJ

2 out of 5 stars

One guy ruins it

I’ve tried a couple of times to listen to this podcast, because the guests have a huge depth of musical knowledge and I’d love to stay up and what is current. But the host of the show is absolutely intolerable. He inserts himself into every guest’s comments, always bringing it back to him and fancying himself a comedian– – who cares?? And he embarrasses himself trying to be hip, throwing out phrases like “that’s fire” and “ cool AF” unsubscribed.

Cvmaddux

4 out of 5 stars

aretha

ok love you guys but I’m 54 and referring to aretha at that ages as an old lady (w/ nothing left to give the world) was just inaccurate and, frankly, mean. i have plenty left to give this world.

UvaSpaceNerd

5 out of 5 stars

Nicki Minaj Popcast

In your most recent popcast on Nicki Minaj and Travis Scott, you mentioned a fellow podcast “penny something” about the music streaming industry. Would you happen to have the full name of that podcast? I love your show! You provide a great cultural insight into a lot of the nuance of the current music scene. Keep up the amazing work!

Yeezy Jumped Over the Jumpman

5 out of 5 stars

Last Popcast

Pleas keep Briana Younger on this amazing Popcast please and thank you. Love the Popcast in general and I honestly wish you did more than one a week just sayin

latersssssss

4 out of 5 stars

Probable-Cast

Popcast: Lover of Drake. Likely to be the popular opinion. Don’t expect much nuance. I still enjoy listening however. The first time I image searched the host and the voice fit the image, whatever that means, take it as you will.

BaLLeR11311

1 out of 5 stars

Alex jones like

Apple should remove all my times channels

Alice_AAGH

3 out of 5 stars

Only for pop insiders

I am shocked that this is a New York Times production because clearly the audience is only for people deeply interested and invested in the intricacies of the pop world and the internet. I’m 34, so I’m technically a millenial, and I’m very interested in music and culture, though typically more alternative than pop. I have no idea what the people on this podcast are talking about half the time and it makes it almost unlistenable. For example, the latest episode is on stanning and clap back culture. I didn’t know what either of those things were and they were never explained so it took several minutes of confusion and inference to figure it out, meanwhile they have moved on to talking about Stan armies by name without mentioning the celeb they are a fan of until 20 minutes later. Maybe this podcast isn’t aimed at people like me, but it’s frustrating because clearly the hosts have a diverse, thoughtful, and educated view of pop and I would love to hear their opinions if only they’d take the time to start with the basics and go from there.

Clamour Lamour

5 out of 5 stars

Discovering a new star

You guys need to hear this girl name Xina Leoná Stella on YouTube. She only posts specific projects. She speaks of humble, world problems, herself, what she has gone through, rape, etc. she brings that vibe that artists lack on bringing she’s coming out with more projects of course it’s just a matter of time search her up on YouTube listen to “I Get Around” & “cold” her poem of one of their altercations in her life. Trust she has what it takes just cause she doesn’t have the money for the best quality doesn’t mean her stuff isn’t poppin!

Hammering Hamp

5 out of 5 stars

Long time listener

This podcast has been consistently excellent since capt. caramonica took the rudder full time a couple of years ago. Salty banter but great structure and the quality of criticism you would expect from the NYT. Keep up the good work, popcast crew.

6R4Y WÜLF

4 out of 5 stars

Popcast

R.I.P. Jaseh

mellomag

5 out of 5 stars

💜💜💜 🎵🎵

I love this pod. The interactions because Joe and Jon are great, Karen is great. Just listened to the Pusha T & Drake episode unpacked - yes I’m behind a bit - but it was fantastic. Joe and Jon know what they are talking about and I love listening.

strategery52

1 out of 5 stars

Long episodes, not easy to follow

This podcast promised to go over modern pop music, but the hosts spend much of their time criticizing in a pretentious way without actually analyzing the music itself. Also, the podcast is censored, making it harder to take seriously. I’m unsubscribing now, and will just listen to Switched on Pop instead.

sawerner09

1 out of 5 stars

Woof...

You’re better off listening to Song Exploder and/or Switched On Pop. These shows are much more insightful with actual musical examples—what a concept!

IrnBruNYC

3 out of 5 stars

Interesting topics and guests, but Caramanica is the worst

Jon Caramanica has a nice radio voice, but I find his personality profoundly grating (grating enough that I felt the need to review this podcast). His “sense of humor” is so smirky and self-satisfied and his use of hip-hop vernacular is extremely labored as he desperately tries to prove to his listeners and guests how clever and hip he is. He sometimes has good insights, so I imagine he is a good writer, but listening to Caramanica is annoying on a good day and exhausting on a bad one. The Times’ chief music critic Jon Pareles is great, but he is rarely on the show these days.

jabaumann

2 out of 5 stars

Torn

On one hand I like a lot of the topics on this podcast. And I like some of the guests. But the host epitomizes everything wrong with the hipper-than-thou critic stereotype. I can’t listen to more than one episode every month because of him.

James Joint

1 out of 5 stars

JT episode

These two guys seem to have really missed a lot in the Timberlake backlash. I think it would’ve been smarter to include a black voice in that convo. It started when he began tweeting condescending things toward black ppl on twitter. That was the start of his downfall, those of us that let him cook in the past we’re done with him after that. It’s also a matter of him using black artists/music are validate his brand but not speaking up for causes that are important to black ppl politically (same category as Iggy). What he got away with in terms of throwing our legends under the bus or speaking ill of them ie. Janet and Prince, folks felt the need to let him know he was cancelled. Certain consciousness is raised especially regarding the sexism that influenced the Janet/Justin Super Bowl backlash he’s just not gonna skate anymore.

elizschles

4 out of 5 stars

Cranberries episode

Please keep these hosts and cool it on the Caramanica. So tired of that guy’s voice!! More women please!!

SingItBack

3 out of 5 stars

It’s ok

Here’s the thing- when Popcast has a good episode, it’s fantastic. The bad news is good episodes are fairly infrequent. My main critique is directed at how indulgent the show is. It revolves around the interests of Mr Caramanica- which is fair since it’s his show, but it’s led to me turning off most episodes after 15 minutes. One could play a drinking game based on mentions of SoundCloud and wind up in the hospital. However, I do still subscribe and I still listen occasionally. This is an alright podcast that could be so much better with a bit more attention to “pop,” to offset all the niche topics.

bryngobango

4 out of 5 stars

Pretty good

Just be ready to hear the 40 year old white New Yorker talk like a 17 year old black kid on the Internet

Matt Rodbard

5 out of 5 stars

BEST 💽

Simple: best music writers in the business going off on the topics they love. I listen every week.

Baron_69

2 out of 5 stars

A boring, narrow perspective

Just what the world needs - another show with two old white guys critiquing music. Yawn.

Bill from Fullerton

1 out of 5 stars

Seriously?

After giving this podcast 7 or 8 months to win me over, I just can't do it anymore. The hosts go beyond lacking knowledge, and often veer into bad knowledge. The subject matter is narrow on its best days which would lead you to believe they would at least know a lot about the thin slice of music they cover, yet they can't even handle their area of expertise (rappers named Lil and Soundcloud). The only episodes that are worth listening to are ones where other writers from the NYT music staff appear and that's not nearly enough. The episode about whether or not Soundcloud is a business or a community may have been the most ill-informed discussion happening outside of the Oval. That episode's subject had everything you could ask for to have an in-depth and informative conversation. They simply didn't know what they were talking about, and instead created a false narrative that serves no purpose towards understanding what went wrong and what needs to happen in order for SC to be a successful business model AND community. Time for a re-boot.

S. Bushman

2 out of 5 stars

Wish I like it but...

I honestly really want to like this podcast but I find the host both condesending and quite rude to his other pannel members. He's interrupted every woman that I've heard speak on the show, and while I understand that the NYT thinks of itself as 'high-brow' this feels like a music critics circle-jerk in the most insufferable way.

Chrismarchie

4 out of 5 stars

Poorly Named

The podcast is well produced and has some great guests on it, but the name "podcast" is extremely misleading. I was looking for a podcast focused on Pop, but was disappointed to see so many episodes dedicated to Rap, Rock, Hip-Hop etc.

Reviewermouts

5 out of 5 stars

Great podcast

Love the content and the speakers!!! Thanks for making such a great show

Cadubcl

2 out of 5 stars

Not the best

Didn't really like the main reviewers or lots of the music they've reviewed. Sound Opinions and All Songs Considered are better. The best was the late The Needle Drop.

Taylor Franklin

5 out of 5 stars

The Best

I learn so much about music every time I listen. I also lol a bunch. A true gift for music nerds.

Cann-Dee

5 out of 5 stars

Love this podcast!

Jon Caramanica et al cover just about all genres and all artists in the round. I've discovered new music, as well as gotten great insight into music I was already familiar with it. Mostly I love that most of the discussions stays in positive territory. Listen; you won't regret it.

JeremiahOnx

5 out of 5 stars

10/10 recommend

By far the best discussion I've ever heard for any album.

michdavidadams

2 out of 5 stars

Pretty good

It's entertaining, but they often bring up appropriation. It kinda feels out of place sometimes.

zvw90

5 out of 5 stars

👌

nyt music popcast, aka soulcycle for my ears, aka how did this become the jon caramanica show, aka pour out some for ben ratliff.. is lit 🔥

W.C. Quinn

3 out of 5 stars

Fansplaining, with occasionally great episodes

When the Popcast exposes you to new music and the social context of music, it succeeds wonderfully. But the ratio of actual music played to comments made by the hosts in a strenuous effort to sound cool is increasingly lopsided towards the latter. On one of the most recent episodes (“The Return of New York Rap”), there weren’t any samples of the songs the hosts were discussing until 25:53. It’s moments like these where the Brooklynite hipsterism of the program risks leaving behind listeners who may not have a great deal of exposure to an artist or genre. (“Haven’t heard of X artist? Do you even know what bars are, bruh?” as host Jon Caramanica might say, like a parent trying just a little too hard to sound cool.) That’s unfortunate, because this show has the potential to make music more accessible to a broad audience but often doesn’t. More sampling, interviews, and accompanying show notes would help it fulfill that promise.

3rdCoastsDaughter

2 out of 5 stars

sighhh…. just no

This feels long. And it’s less than an hour. Yes, what is suppose to be the ideal podcast time feels stretched out by mansplaining mainly hip-hop. NYTimes usually does it right. And most of the titles seemed like things that I would enjoy, but… Unfortunately, the overanalyzes becomes drab and annoying without SOUL. It seems like a very detached observation of rap/hip-hop and sometimes the music industry.

AnaCalles

5 out of 5 stars

Nice

It's awesome

Jreadernews

5 out of 5 stars

Love this show

Always helps me think critically about music. Smart guests and hosts. Wish they'd play a bit more of the music they're discussing.

VitaliyI

5 out of 5 stars

Insightful and broad scope

I've recently discovered this amazing podcast from an interview Ben did form about he podcast I listen to. What continues to impress me is the breadth of music covered and how interesting the conversations are.

fayettehickox

5 out of 5 stars

Dazzled

I have listened to a couple of these—those on Joanna Newsom and the influence Kanye’s 808—and am struck by the inquiring minds and sparky, playful conversations.

Herself

4 out of 5 stars

Informative and interesting BUT

… why are there no female talkers on this? The music-bros talking to other music-bros thing on here is conspicuous and really kind of embarrassing. Expect better from the NY Times.

Adamgghhhh

5 out of 5 stars

The best music podcast

Jon Caramanica is a legend and I routinely listen to him discuss musicians I've never heard before because he's so good. Massive fan.

olugbam

5 out of 5 stars

The Smartest Conversations about Rap

Introspective conversations about rap music with people who know the genre but also the broader cultural contexts in which the music is made. Breathtaking and interesting from start to finish.

Jen Mussari

2 out of 5 stars

Interrupting Host

Finding this really hard to listen to because Jon Caramanica interrupts his guests almost every sentence; trying to finish their sentences; or is interspersing the guests’ speeches with “mhm” “yup” and “yeah” after every phrase. Which is a shame, because I was really expecting this podcast to be a new favorite of mine. It’s just very hard to listen to overall. The subject matter seems great and I appreciate how varied the genre explorations are. But I actually cannot listen to this without feeling stressed out.

Geddybonscott

5 out of 5 stars

Insightful takes on music

Cool discussions from music geeks on all genres. I dig the passion they have!

frosteaux

2 out of 5 stars

Too much talk, not enough music

I enjoy the NYT capsule reviews and had wanted to hear the music discussed each week. While it's nice to hear some background, there's too much talk--particularly too much opinion--and not enough music. The music clips are few and far between and last about 10 seconds. The discussion, on the other hand, drones on and on...

DANG YAYA

5 out of 5 stars

The Truth About JT

Great review of JT's new album. You said a lot of what I was thinking and I think many are afraid to admit. The album is like his acting....missing something.

Mathrocksmash

4 out of 5 stars

What happened

This is my second favorite music podcast after Sound Opinions. I like shows that have opinions about music. They play something they do not like and then say why. As opposed to most music shows where they play only stuff they like. if you don't like their taste then your left with no entertainment value. People should realize that music is more a divisive medium and talk about it as such. Many of these music shows seem like they like everything and everybody. That is boring! It would be like watching a reality TV show where everybody gets along. Not that I really like any reality TV. Only analogy I could think of.

quad-cross

5 out of 5 stars

Check it out

This podcast features interviews and commentary from the pop and jazz critics of the NY Times, who seem to have a genuine rapport with each other and also a well rounded view of current artists in the context of today's music biz. They don't sound desperately cool or hopefully hip like npr hosts, they just talk about the music, why it's news and where it fits in the culture or marketplace. Sisario is a good host, asks direct questions, is willing to play the music fan as well as an expert. The live sets are greatly missed, and we hope they come back.

R.C. Haymans

4 out of 5 stars

Very enjoyable podcast.

I had stopped listening to the podcast awhile back because it sounded pretty crappy. I started listening again several weeks ago and was pleasantly surprised. The quality is much improved and the live performances and artist interviews are a real treat.

MommaJam2

5 out of 5 stars

MommaJam Loves This Podcast

I like the tone and content of this music podcast. Very informative! Keep up the great work! I listen while working out.

Agnostic Monk

3 out of 5 stars

Good show but a little pretentious in it's music choices

I enjoy this show. The New York Times has some great writers and that comes through in this show. What I do not care for is their predictability. The show is about some pretentious world music release which is seldom popular in country of origin but popular in the west, romantic singer songwriters and nearly every commercial release gets a mention. I contrast this show with Sound Opinions of Chicago Public Radio and marvel at how they have the balance just right. I discover artists and at the same time have an excellent mix of genres to listen to. I wish the music popcast would take a risk and stop being so coventional and predictable.

jamesohh

3 out of 5 stars

When can we expect news podcasts?

The Popcast is great but they haven't updated it in a while. I'm patiently waiting for new episodes.

Naveed

4 out of 5 stars

Please remove the cardboard box from Jon Pareles' head

Every week, Pareles sounds like he's talking to us from inside a cardboard box. All other reviewers sound natural. Please remove the cardboard box from Jon Pareles' head.

Gbradley

2 out of 5 stars

wow

listeners of this should go for the more direct, less applause happy fellas of Have you Heard.

ls123

4 out of 5 stars

I thought this podcast was interesting to listen to. It tells alot about the songs and it lets you listen to them. It also lets people discover new music.

fotogeneric

2 out of 5 stars

Not the best music podcast

I recommend NPR's All Songs Considered. It's more in-depth, explores more artists and just has a better "feel" to it.

Rue St. Vincent

4 out of 5 stars

wow. that seals it

i found this podcast when looking at the best podcasts of 2006 feature on itunes. after being a little skeptical about subscribing i saw the range of music covered including a artist named Z-ro. thats range folks as that adresses where i live and listen to in houston texas. u guys rock for that. thanks

scatterlined

4 out of 5 stars

Well constructed 10 minutes from the critics

I find it a nice companion to the iTunes New Music Tuesday podcast; in fact I usually prefer it to the iNMT podcast. You get to listen to more of the album here to get your own impression and I find the reviewers comments helpful. I am also a big fan of the occasional look beyond the numbers for insight into the music business and history of an album or artist.

JcSanHusky

5 out of 5 stars

Simply the best music popcast.

If you want to discover new artist or albums, this is the perfect "Popcast". Unlike, Itunes New Music Tuesday Podcast, (who limit themselves to make a review of the Home Page of Itunes music store), NYT Popcast, explore deeply in the albums, giving you the oportunity to really taste the music. You're not gonna like every artist or albums review they make, but I assure you gonna have a wonderful journey in pop music world. keep doing the good work, guys!